1. is pay for the lands
2. serving in the Confederacy
3. it provides major income for the state.
4. Federal Department of Education
5. local companies setting up small competitive operations
6. The people had a chosen leadership hierarchy
7. they refused to accept it
8. all of them
9. Cherokees under John Ross
10. don't know
11. Alabama
12. don't know
I hope this helps sowwy i didn't two of them and i hope i got them right for chu
The Supreme Court was affirming the point that states (not the federal government) should be in charge of the voting procedures in their states.The Supreme Court decision you're referring to, which invalidated pre-clearance conditions, was Shelby County v. Holder (2013). "Pre-clearance" meant that certain states, according to the Voting Rights Acts of 1965, had to get approval in advance from federal authorities for any changes they made to their state regulations regarding voting. That standard had been applied to several states because they had displayed discriminatory practice in their voting laws. The decision in Shelby County v. Holder held that the federal government could not keep applying that requirement on the basis of decades-old data.
I recently posted another answer on Shelby County v. Holder, which you can check out too. Read more on Brainly.com -
brainly.com/question/9069264#readmore
Answer:
He supported the goals and tactics of Martin Luther King, Jr., and César Chávez.
Explanation:
Because lots of jewish buildings and synagogues that were smashed, it was called the night of broken glass, or Kristallnacht