Answer:
the bystander effect.
Explanation:
The bystander effect: The term bystander effect is also referred to as bystander apathy or bystander intervention. This is one of the psychological phenomenon which explains that an individual has got the least tendency of helping the other person in an emergency when there are other person present in the given situation competitively when the individual is alone.
Hence, in an emergency, the observers are more likely to intervene if there are no other witnesses present at the moment.
In the question above, Mrs. Blake's experience best illustrates the bystander effect.
The situation will be definitely different if our founding fathers only slightly patched and amended the articles of confederation and never replaced it with the United States constitution. People will not have that rights which they the Constitution of United States gives them.
There will be no systematic way to run the country, no sequence of rules and regulation. The growth will totally differ from which is in present time. The country will be in debt and no social justice will be spread.
The Second World War was history's largest and most significant armed conflict. It served as the breeding ground for the modern structure of security and intelligence, and for the postwar balance of power that formed the framework for the Cold War. Weapons, materiel, and actual combat, though vital to the Allies' victory over the Axis, did not alone win the war. To a great extent, victory was forged in the work of British and American intelligence services, who ultimately overcame their foes' efforts. Underlying the war of guns and planes was a war of ideas, images, words, and impressions—intangible artifacts of civilization that yielded enormous tangible impact for the peoples of Europe, east Asia, and other regions of the world.
Answer:
They moved to the cities to work in factories, leading to the urbanization of the national economy.
Explanation:
The British Agricultural Revolution took place between the seventeenth to the nineteenth century in Britain. It was a revolution which led to an enormous increase in the production of agricultural products. This was the result of the increase in the land and the labor supply. The countryside was vacated and the industrial production was multiplied. The peasants lost their land that got concentrated in the hands of few. They had no other option than to force themselves to work in the industries. This led to an increase in urbanization.
Im pretty sure they didn't think it was right