The correct answer to this open question is the following.
I think what could have happened to the nation if the Missouri Compromise had not passed was that events, incidents, differences, and debates would have caused the premature beginning of the American Civil War in 1820.
Those years were a time of too much tension. The issue of slavery had already divided the nation.
That moment really illustrated the dichotomy of American society's attitudes about slavery in the early 19th century.
The context of the Missouri Compromise of 1820 was that there were many problems with slavery in the states. Some approved and depended on slavery, others -mostly the Northern states- disapproved and supported desegregation. In 1819, Missouri asked to enter the Union as a slave state, breaking the balance between supporters and non-supporters. By passing the Missouri compromise, the US Congress had an opportunity to soothe the complicated situation. It granted the Missouri request, and at the same time, Main was admitted as a free state.
Single stories negatively relate to U.S. history because it caused a lot of hate to be given toward a specific person or group of people just because someone made up a fake story. Single stories have always been a problem not just now but all throughout history.
Booker T. Washington said the African American people should prove they were worthy of the rights that the white men had, while Du Bois said they should demand those rights immediatly. Plz mark brainliest.
Reparations, a levy on a defeated country forcing it to pay some of the war costs of the winning countries. Reparations were levied on the Central Powers after World War I to compensate the Allies for some of their war costs. They were meant to replace war indemnities which had been levied after earlier wars as a punitive measure as well as to compensate for economic losses. After World War II the Allies levied reparations principally on Germany, Italy, Japan, and Finland.
