1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
xz_007 [3.2K]
3 years ago
7

To what does the term roaring 20s refer?

History
1 answer:
Leona [35]3 years ago
6 0

The term "Roaring '20s" refers to the decade of the 1920s in the United States, which was a time of much economic growth, as well as much social and cultural change.

In the 1920s, cities grew rapidly and industry was growing immensely in the United States.  Jazz and other forms of entertainiment (like radio) were expanding and reaching new audiences.  Women were becoming more involved in public life.  The stock market was a place of much speculation and investment -- too much, as it turned out.  The stock market crashed in 1929.   America had thought it was in great times during the Roaring '20s.  But then everything came crashing down and minds and hearts were depressed, as the country entered into the next decade and an economic tragedy known as the Great Depression. 

You might be interested in
Out of all the cases that are appealed, which ones are heard in the Supreme Court?
Serjik [45]

Answer:either the first choice or the last choice

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
During the debate over the constitution which party argued for strong independent sates
Sav [38]

Answer:

democrative

Explanation:

because they seeing whos going to ga agents trump

6 0
2 years ago
What was the outcome of the Worcester v. Georgia court case? A. The Cherokees won the right to stay on their land and were deeme
Evgen [1.6K]

Answer:  A. The Cherokees won the right to stay on their land and were deemed an independent nation.

<em>(That was a hollow victory though -- see last paragraph of explanation below.)</em>

<em />

Explanation:

The 1832 case, Worcester v. Georgia, ruled unconstitutional a Georgia law requiring non-Native Americans requiring a license from the state to be on Native American land.  In responding to the case, the Supreme Court asserted that the federal government is the sole authority to deal with a Native American nation.  From this Supreme Court assertion came the beginnings of tribal sovereignty within the United States for Native American nations -- that the US government would deal with them as domestic nations inside the United States.

The court case was named after Samuel Worcester, a Christian minister working among the Cherokee who was supportive of the Cherokee cause.  To block the activity of a man like Rev. Worcester, the state of Georgia passed a law prohibiting white persons to live within the Cherokee Nation territory without permission from the Georgia state government.  Worcester and other missionaries challenged this law, and the case rose to the level of a Supreme Court decision.  The decision by the Supreme Court, written by Chief Justice Marshall, struck down the Georgia law and reprimanded Georgia for interfering in the affairs of the Cherokee Nation.  Marshall wrote that Indian nations are "distinct, independent political communities retaining their original natural rights." 

But President Andrew Jackson chose not to enforce the court's decision.  He said at the time: "The decision of the Supreme Court has fell stillborn, and they find that it cannot coerce Georgia to yield to its mandate."  He told the Cherokee that they would need to operate under the jurisdiction of the state of Georgia or else relocate.  This was a step in the direction of what became known as the "Trail of Tears," when the Cherokee were removed from Georgia and moved to territory in Oklahoma.

3 0
3 years ago
due to the distance between britain and north america british soldiers in north amrica often lacked what?
I am Lyosha [343]
I think the answer is communication!
3 0
2 years ago
According to Hinduism, to go against dharma leads to bad karma, while living according to dharma brings good karma. explain why
aivan3 [116]

Answer:

Due to ideology and belief.

Explanation:

To go against dharma leads to bad karma, while living according to dharma brings good karma, this is true in Hinduism because this is the ideology of Hindu religion and their belief on the eternal concept of atman. Dharma means religion or religious values while karma means the result of action. Those individuals which go against religion, the result of this action will be bad while if the individuals which follow religion, the result of this action will be good.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which is the best conclusion about the Amazon rainforest that can be drawn from these sources?
    10·1 answer
  • Why would some women want to fight in the war
    10·1 answer
  • How were United States senators chosen before the general population was able to vote for them?
    6·1 answer
  • the third paragraph again. Given what Hammond is saying, what might be a potential problem for the North if the two sides, North
    9·1 answer
  • In what way did John Locke influence the Patriot's viewpoints?
    14·1 answer
  • Please help me ASAP
    9·2 answers
  • Which factors led to the creation of the state of Israel? Select three options.
    12·2 answers
  • What were bad things john locke did? help i need this asap !!
    5·1 answer
  • During what period did the United States have recessions? How do you know?
    6·1 answer
  • Materials used to build the Central Pacific Railroad were shipped…?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!