All categories

3 years ago

What best describes a faithless elector

2 answers:

8 0

1. D<span>.an elector who does not vote for the person who won stated popular vote
Faithless electors place their vote against the popular vote of a state population in presidential elections. They are referred to as "faithless" because they lose the faith of the citizens of the state to vote to their wishes.

2. </span><span>B.senate
In a joint session of Congress, House of Representatives and Senate members come together to hear the count of the electoral votes. The Senate reads the votes out loud to the Congressional members.
</span><span>
3. Florida
A dispute over the ballots in Florida cause controversy in the 2000 election between George Bush and Al Gore. A recount was requested by Al Gore but controversy over hanging ballot pieces made it difficult to conduct the recount. The Supreme Court ended the recount, leaving George Bush announced as the winner of the election. </span>

Vitek1552 [10]3 years ago

5 0

1.a faithless elector is .an elector who does not vote for the person who won stated popular vote .
2. the electoral college vote counted by .senate.
.3. the supreme court decisions brush v.gore involved a dispute over to vote counting with Florida.

You might be interested in

Finish filling in the steps your idea would have to go through to become a law at both federal and state levels of government. P

Studentka2010 [4]

Answer:

Snow glows white on the mountain tonight

Not a footprint to be seen

A kingdom of isolation

And it looks like I'm the queen

The wind is howling like this swirling storm inside

Couldn't keep it in, heaven knows I've tried

Don't let them in, don't let them see

Be the good girl you always have to be

Conceal, don't feel, don't let them know

Well, now they know

Let it go, let it go

Can't hold it back anymore

Let it go, let it go

Turn away and slam the door

I don't care what they're going to say

Let the storm rage on

The cold never bothered me anyway

Let it go, let it go

Can't hold it back anymore

Let it go, let it go

Turn away and slam the door

Let it go

It's funny how some distance makes everything seem small

And the fears that once…Explanation:

7 0

4 years ago

What were the lessons learned from the gulf war? what was the controversy behind the gulf war ?

vichka [17]

I can't help you with your second question but heres a site that I've found to help you with your 1st one. I hope this helps^-^

https://nationalinterest.org/feature/5-big-lessons-the-first-gulf-war-13536

4 0

3 years ago

How many colonists joined the british army in protest against the rebellion?

jonny [76]

<h2><u>Answer:</u></h2>

The history of the American Revolution truly starts with the French and Indian War (1754-63), without which no defiance would have occurred when it did. The British assumed control North America toward the finish of the war, administering the district north of Florida and west to the Mississippi River. Investigate the guide above.

Homesteaders wouldn't have parted from Britain on the off chance that despite everything they required their insurance from the French (green), who'd blocked western extension in the Ohio Valley. Americans and Redcoats battled together against the French at the same time, as the maxim goes, recognition breeds disdain, and frontier local armies detested the hatred of their bosses in the British military.

All the more significantly, a few pilgrims didn't feel that they required the British any longer and the populace occupying these developing, asset rich states was for all intents and purposes self-chose for resistance to power, huge numbers of its pioneers having emigrated from the British Isles to look for more noteworthy opportunity.

They bristled under British endeavors to keep them close to the East Coast and squabbled about money-related issues in regards to duties and exchange. By 1763, the time had come to tidy off the Join, or Die. woodcut Ben Franklin had imprinted in 1754 to rally pilgrims in the interest of the British against the French; at the same time, this time, they were reviving against their very own rulers. More than 50,000 took part in the protest.

5 0

3 years ago

How was the treatment of enslaved Africans different under English rule than it was under the rule of the Dutch?

slega [8]

Answer:

I believe that under English Rule Slavery was almost slightly more fair than the way the Dutch used their rule/power

Explanation:

The Dutch West India Company imported 11 African slaves to New Amsterdam in 1626, with the first slave auction being held in New Amsterdam in 1655.

Slavery in Great Britain existed and was recognized from before the Roman occupation until the 12th century, when chattel slavery disappeared, at least for a time, after the Norman Conquest. Former slaves merged into the larger body of serfs in Britain and no longer were recognized separately in law or custom.

7 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How was Hitler able to gain support of many German people? What tactics did he use?

Marianna [84]

Answer: fear, speeches, faulty promises.

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers