The question doesn't really make sense, science cannot be debunked with facts because science aims to hypothesize, test, and draw conclusions based off evidence, which has told us what is factual and what is not for the entirety of out existence. How can science even be "wrong" in the way you are putting it? For science as a whole to be wrong would mean we couldn't distinguish reality from fantasy whatsoever. Science isn't wrong if it disproves or discredits someone's beliefs, it is just labeled as biased by the same people who have lived their whole lives believing in a God without ever stopping to think that they might be wrong.
Answer: Well no because he died only a few weeks after inauguration so he barely even got to be the president.
Explanation:
Answer:
C
Explanation:
The Puritans established the colony of Massachusetts Bay in 1630. They hoped to purify the Church of England, and then return to Europe with a new and improved religion. The Puritans had left England because they didn't agree with the Church of England and they wanted to practice their own faith.
Answer:
Citizens showed a renewed interest in communism.
Explanation:
I mean, if they lived and saw first-hand how communism actually worked, and saw that it was a failure, while would they have "renewed interest" in it, when capitalism gave them a better lifestyle?
Answer:
English was the nationality of Charlie Chaplin
