Answer:
Reconstruction's aim was to bring the South back into the Union while protecting the rights and safety of the newly freed slaves.
Explanation:
At the end of the Civil War, there were nearly 4 million former slaves in the South. It was the hope of Reconstructionists that they could be integrated into the fabric of a free society.
The answer is letter C.
Explanation: They are burned in large proportions that generate social and environmental impacts where they occur. The occurrence of fires is related to flammable fuels exposed to lit materials. Fire fighting can be done by removing the source of fire and also by removing material that may burn.
Forest areas are home to a great diversity of species and play an important ecological role in carbon absorption and provide oxygen to the atmosphere. This is a valuable area and it is important to control and prevent fires in these areas.
Answer: created new laws and increased trade
Explanation:
Ofcourse. History can never be neutral. Writing history is necessarily retelling of a past event. Thus the mental pre occupations of the writer is bound to influence the writing.
Historiography is tricky and complex task which includes debates and disagreements among different schools. The historical sources such as archaeological, numismatic evidences, epicgraphic and literary texts does not always give a direct image of the past society from which informations could be mechanically plucked out. Rather its gives a refracted image of the past from which actual facts are needed to be teased out.
There are also chances of interpolations of ancient texts, distortion of evidences due to the ravages of time and misinterpretation of the contemporary texts. All these can influence the writing of history .
Another vital factor that needs to be considered while judging the authenticity of a text is the background of the writer, the sources to which he was exposed,the patron of writing and his affiliation to any particular ideology and motive of writing .
A good historian must eliminate any biasedness and distortion of facts while writing history. But it can surely be subjctive.
<u><em>President Harry Truman</em></u>, by August 1945, had to take an<u> important decision about ending the war with Japan as soon as possible, knowing that they (Japanese) already lost the war at that moment.</u> <u><em>President Truman</em></u> had four options: 1. Continue conventional bombing; 2. A ground invasion of Japan; 3. Demonstration of the bomb on a deserted island; or, 4. Use of the bomb on a populated Japanese city. After careful considerations, <em><u>President Truman</u></em>, his advisors, and commanders decided to bomb Hiroshima to make a strong impression on Japanese Emperor, Army, and civilians.
If dropping the bomb was the right decision or not, it's still not easy to affirm. <u>However, the goal was to get a quick surrender from Japan and to do not extend the war uselessly.</u> In that sense, it was a painful and effective decision.