Although it can be persuasive, a logical fallacy is detrimental to an argument.
This fallacy consists in arguing that a conclusion is false because an argument given for it is bad. There are two main ways for an argument to be bad:
- At least one of the reasons given for the conclusion is bad―that is, false.
- The reasoning of the argument is bad, that is, the reasons given do not support the conclusion strongly enough to meet the burden of proof.
Can we see a prompt of her view or something please
<span>The Declaration of Independence says: In every stage of these oppressions we have petitioned for redress in the most humble terms: our repeated petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people. Indicates desire to not make an absolute break. </span>
Answer:
Mahatma Gandhi (1869 – 1948): Activist – India
Mahatma Gandhi is the political activist who was the leader of the Indian National Congress and ultimately led India to its freedom and independence from British colonial rule. He has changed the world by being a strong source of inspiration for civil rights movements through his non-violent non-cooperation approach.
Before leading the Indian National Congress, Gandhi studied law at University and then travelled to South Africa. It was there that he spent 21 years fighting against the injustices and racial discrimination in South African society. He is a role model for all of us to bring justice and harmony between people of all faiths. He has firmly earnt a place in the historic events that changed the world.
Explanation:
