1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dimulka [17.4K]
3 years ago
15

Why were some constitutional scholars concerned about President George W. Bush’s interpretation of executive privilege?

History
2 answers:
Studentka2010 [4]3 years ago
6 0
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "They knew that once invoked, executive privilege would shield Bush from investigations." some constitutional scholars concerned about President George W. Bush’s interpretation of executive privilege because <span>They knew that once invoked, executive privilege would shield Bush from investigations.</span>
iris [78.8K]3 years ago
5 0

The answer is They knew that once invoked, executive privilege would shield Bush from investigations.  The Bush Adminstration invoked executive privileges six times. During each time it had done so, it concerned investigations steaming from the war on terror to meeting with government officials as well requiring members of his team to testify.

You might be interested in
What is the system of promises which governed the relationship between lords and vassals?
SIZIF [17.4K]
The answer is C. Feudalism
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
100 POINTS reconstruction in the south from white womens pov. 10 sentences DIARY ENTRY
Zolol [24]

Answer:

Reconstruction involved more than the meaning of emancipation. Women also sought to redefine their roles within the nation and in their local communities. The abolitionist and women’s rights movements simultaneously converged and began to clash. In the South, both black and white women struggled to make sense of a world of death and change. In Reconstruction, leading women’s rights advocate Elizabeth Cady Stanton saw an unprecedented opportunity for disenfranchised groups—women as well as African Americans, northern and southern—to seize political rights. Stanton formed the Women’s Loyal National League in 1863, which petitioned Congress for a constitutional amendment abolishing slavery. The Thirteenth Amendment marked a victory not only for the antislavery cause, but also for the Loyal League, proving women’s political efficacy and the possibility for radical change. Now, as Congress debated the meanings of freedom, equality, and citizenship for former slaves, women’s rights leaders saw an opening to advance transformations in women’s status, too. On the tenth of May 1866, just one year after the war, the Eleventh National Women’s Rights Convention met in New York City to discuss what many agreed was an extraordinary moment, full of promise for fundamental social change. Elizabeth Cady Stanton presided over the meeting. Also in attendance were prominent abolitionists, with whom Stanton and other women’s rights leaders had joined forces in the years leading up to the war. Addressing this crowd of social reformers, Stanton captured the radical spirit of the hour: “now in the reconstruction,” she declared, “is the opportunity, perhaps for the century, to base our government on the broad principle of equal rights for all. "Stanton chose her universal language—“equal rights for all”—with intention, setting an agenda of universal suffrage for the activists. Thus, in 1866, the National Women’s Rights Convention officially merged with the American Antislavery Society to form the American Equal Rights Association (AERA). This union marked the culmination of the longstanding partnership between abolitionist and women’s rights advocates.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Why did people that were against the holocaust let it happen?
xenn [34]

It can be seen through the term "silent majority", in which those who were against the Holocaust did not voice their opinions for fear of being oppressed by the Nazi Power, and were not able to stand together against the regime. Many people did not want the Holocaust to happen, but because they did not stand up against it & voice their opinion, it still occurred. Remember, those who know about the situation and stay in the sidelines are as bad as the perpetrators themselves.

8 0
3 years ago
Please Help!!!
Vsevolod [243]

Answer:

if they are discrimatory

Explanation:

3 0
4 years ago
Pro-Ana websites increased by how much in 2006 and 2007?
ki77a [65]

Answer:

A survey by Internet security firm Optenet found a 470% increase in pro-ana and pro-mia sites from 2006 to 2007.

Explanation:

8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What did the rightly guided caliph use as guides to leadership
    10·1 answer
  • What was the cause of Shays’ Rebellion?
    7·1 answer
  • In Athens' Council of 500, what did councilmen do?
    11·1 answer
  • Find the median of the following data:<br> 10,16, 15, 14, 8, 21, 10, 5, 19, 18,4,5, 16, 12, 10,9
    15·1 answer
  • How did the Confederate Constitution handle the issue of slavery?
    9·2 answers
  • 1. Which of the following best states a difference between the inaugural addresses of Abraham Lincoln and Jefferson Davis?
    12·2 answers
  • Consider the major inventions of the late 19th and early 20th century. List at least two inventions and discuss their effects on
    6·2 answers
  • How did delegates compromise on the issues of state representation in Congress , slavery trade, and the presidency?
    12·1 answer
  • What was life like during the Great Depression in America? How was it different for different demographics ?
    10·2 answers
  • 100 points giveaway 4 time limited edition giveaway
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!