Answer: C) Gamal Abdel Nasser
Answer:
There are a couple reasons
Explanation:
They waste taxpayer funds, grow out of control, and encourage corruption, just to name a few.
Answer:
CUMIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIPAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Explanation:
Oklahoma's economic history is divided into four periods. The first period covers the nineteenth century, encompassing settlement by American Indians of the Southeast followed by new arrangements facilitating private land ownership. The second extends from 1900 to the onset of the Great Depression in 1930. The third ends in 1973 with the first of the major oil shocks. The fourth comprises the energy boom and bust of the late twentieth century, along with contemporary conditions.
The century from 1800 to 1900 encompassed the time of Indian and white settlement. During the nineteenth century Oklahoma was characterized by very high ratios of land to labor and capital, by almost total dominance of primary (natural resource based) production, and by unique institutional and cultural features, of which the effects of some remain important in today's economy. The initial settlement by the Five Civilized Tribes in the 1820s, 1830s, and 1840s in what is now Oklahoma (at that time Indian Territory) did not reflect free-market labor migration in response to income differentials. Added to the coercion of removal was the fact that the Five Tribes had adopted the institution of slavery in their former southern setting. Slave-owning Indians brought with them an additional labor supply.
Answer:
The neolithic revolution
Explanation:
This was a new start to all groups. It evolved hunter and gatherers into a more "civilized" population. The people found out about agriculture. People started to farm more which lead to a good source of sustainable food. This lead people to settle down and build in the area they farmed in. More food created a more stable life which helped increase the population.
