I would say the second option - "She skipped off, singing"
It gives a visual of her being very happy, instead of just saying she was happy.
Answer:
i have no idea :) someone help her.
Explanation:
Answer:
Karate if you know how do karate you can beat boxer
Explanation:
Have great day
Hi, you've asked an incomplete/unclear question. The full question read;
Which of the phrases below is <u>not</u> in the future perfect continuous?
a) You will have been waiting here for three hours by 8 o'clock.
b) You will be waiting for her when her plane arrives tonight.
c) By the end of next month I will have been living here for ten years.
d) When I finish this course, I will have been learning Italian for ten years.
e) Next month I will have been working here for two years.
Answer:
<u>b) You will be waiting for her when her plane arrives tonight.</u>
Explanation:
We make this conclusion because the phrase <em>"will have been" </em> (which is the future perfect of the verb "to be") is often added to the subject of a sentence to make it future perfect continuous.
However, after careful check of all the sentences, we notice all of them except option b used the future perfect continuous phrase, <em>"will have been." </em>
A) (Sentence 2) The freighter Florentine, 320 miles northeast of the Hawaiian Island of Hilo was lumbering along at about 15 knots when a garbled message came in over the radio.
This is the sentence that has a missing necessary comma. Another comma should have been placed after the word Hilo and before was.
The commas in this sentence enclosed nonessential information.
<span>The freighter Florentine, 320 miles northeast of the Hawaiian Island of Hilo, was lumbering along at about 15 knots when a garbled message came in over the radio.
</span>
Nonessential information means that if the said phrase is deleted from the sentence, then the sentence would still convey the same message.
<span>
The freighter Florentine was lumbering along at about 15 knots when a garbled message came in over the radio.</span>
