1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Leokris [45]
3 years ago
13

Americans continue to debate the work of the Manhattan project. Give to opposing viewpoints on the treatment of Manhattan projec

t then tell which viewpoint you agree with And why
History
1 answer:
Lemur [1.5K]3 years ago
7 0

The <em>Manhattan Project</em> put to debate the new technology of fission reaction in the last years of WWII. On one side, there was the opinion that the use of uranium could be helpful during the war, since the presence of an atomic explosion might dissuade Japan from surrender instead of making a full-scale invasion to the island. On the other side, there was the academic opinion that mentioned that nuclear energy might cause more frictions between nations. In my opinion, I think that the nuclear energy, derived from the Manhattan Project, used during WWII was needed to finish the war as soon as possible, however, that doesn´t justify the rise of the Cold War. Nowadays, that same source of energy (if handled properly) could provide an alternative source of power, instead of oil, to diminish contemporary climate issues.

You might be interested in
HELP ME PLZ In Robert Holczer’s interview about living through the Holocaust, he discusses the Boy Scouts. Read the excerpt belo
Paraphin [41]

Answer:

Can you please give me the answer plzzzzzzzz

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can some check to see if I got these True or False question right?
lukranit [14]
Yup! These are all correct, I think! Congrats buddy! :)
8 0
3 years ago
HELP PLEASE!
Ivan

Answer:

Is this fine?

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
What were the four weaknesses of the first constitution?
nirvana33 [79]
Couldn’t enforce laws,
couldn’t collect taxes,
There was no executive branch to enforce any acts passed by Congress,
no central government
5 0
2 years ago
Please help me i need help
baherus [9]

The correct answer is C. Denied citizenship rights to blacks

Explanation:

Historically, Northerners opposed slavery, which was a common practice in the Southern states. In this context, northerners believed slavers should be freed and they should be given civil rights. Due to this, when Dred Scott, a black slave, tried to sue his master to obtain freedom as he had been in a "free" territory, and the Supreme Court determined rights from the Constitution did not protect black people (including the right to sue) most northerners were angry. This means the Dredd Scott decision angered northerners because it showed during that time black citizens did not have any rights and were not protected by the Constitution (option C).

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How how are r.w an melvin simms both treating t.j.
    12·2 answers
  • For the people of the Middle Ages what is one thing that they believed it will threatens them in all aspects of their life
    8·1 answer
  • What did alexander the great's generals want him to do
    10·2 answers
  • Which of the following statements is true? The Charter of the United Nations created an international organization devoted to pr
    12·1 answer
  • Explain why hammurabi's code was a significant development
    14·1 answer
  • Why was the industrial revolution successful in belgium
    15·1 answer
  • Relative location of Orlando Florida
    11·1 answer
  • Document definition in relation to the federal government
    14·1 answer
  • In the 1100s, manorialism began to end in European nations for all of the following reasons EXCEPT
    9·2 answers
  • Compare/contrast Feudal Japan and Feudal Europe<br><br><br><br> Please help, more points!!
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!