Answer:
You forgot to add the screen shot!
Explanation:
Hope this helps!
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
Based on the information that was provided in the question, Pablo’s case with regards to the scenario given will be regarded as a civil case due to the fact that Drew is being sued.
The Federal court will be the court where the case will hold. This is due to the fact that the parties involved are from different states. While Pablo is from New Mexico, Drew is from California. For speeding, a criminal case can also be brought against Drew.
Answer:
It can be very difficult for citizens to start private businesses. Citizens must pay for most basic necessities by themselves. There is no guarantee of steady employment for many citizens. Citizens may pay higher taxes than in other economic systems.
Explanation:
hope i helped
Answer:
The options are given below:
a) punctuation
b) interpretation
c) perceptuation
d) conjugation
e) intrepidation
The correct option is A. Punctuation.
Explanation:
To punctuate a communication refers to the interpretation of an ongoing sequence of events by determining that one event is the cause and the resulting event is the response. In a situation with communication, if one thing happens, something else always happens.
In the scenario above, both Shannon and Roger are exemplifying the theory of punctuation, because they each think that their actions are as a result of the actions of the other person.
Answer:
This firm should hire less of C and more of D
Explanation:
Based on the information given we were told that the price of resource C is the amount of $90 while the price of resource D is the amount of $35 ,Therefore based on this it will be advisable for the firm to hire less of C and More of D because the price of resource is C is more higher than the price of resource D when compared, which means that the price of resource D is the best option or alternative for the firm to go for.