Answer:
A. No, because Ahmed is not a merchant.
Explanation:
Implied warranty of merchantability is a law in contract which states that when there is a transaction between a seller (the merchant), and a buyer, there is an unwritten guarantee from the seller, that the product meets up to the ordinary standards of care. This means that the goods must be fit to do what the merchant says it will do. Therefore, if the seller finds it defective, he could return it to the seller. and if the seller refuses to make a change, a legal case could be established. The merchant by law is a wholesaler or retailer, who sells goods in which he has expertise or special skills.
Ahmed in the question could be argued in court to not be a merchant of cars and as such, has no expertise with which he can make a guarantee for the car being sold to Carlos.
Answer:
A. Values
Explanation:
Although, the above explanations entails or encompasses what values are, manners and customs of people in a country; however, values is what summarizes the whole passage.
Values are what a given society holds in high esteem. They are basic and fundamental beliefs that controls actions in a given society. Values may be right or wrong according to the philosophies of those who believes in such, it is however very important because it helps a society determines what is important I.e something that is good, worthwhile and very much desirable.
Answer: $245
Explanation:
If the required return on the stock is 7 percent, the current share price would be calculated as:
= 6.60/1.07 + 17.60/1.07^2 + 22.60/1.07^3 + 4.40/1.07^4 + [(4.4 × 1.0525) / (7%-5.25%)] / 1.07^4
= $245.23
= $245 approximately
Therefore, the current share price will be $245
Answer:
Ricardo’s Theory of Comparative Advantage
Explanation:
Comparative advantage is the term used to define the ability of an individual, firm or country to produce a particular good or service at a lower opportunity cost than that if it’s competitors or trade partners. Opportunity cost is the benefit lost from the second best alternative.
When a country can produce a product more efficiently (i.e maximum output using minimum resources) than that of its trade partners, it is known as that it has absolute advantage in that product. India tends to have absolute advantage in both business processes outsourcing as well as producing agricultural commodities as it is mentioned that it can produce both of these more efficiently than the United States.
However, although it has absolute advantage in both, it is still less efficient in producing agricultural commodities when compared to business process outsourcing. In other words, if it attempts to produce agricultural commodities in-house, the benefit lost from the second best alternative: business process outsourcing is high. The opportunity cost is higher when it produces agricultural commodities than it is when it does business process outsourcing. Hence, due to the law of comparative advantage, it chooses to specialize in business process outsourcing and imports agricultural commodities.
