After reading the video transcript we can say Dr. X is convincing because he supports his explanation with facts, as stated in option B and explained below.
<h3>Why is Dr. X effective and convincing?</h3>
In the video "Dr. X and the Quest for Food Safety," Dr. X is effective at communicating the dangers of cross contamination. The reason for that is the fact that he supports his explanation with facts, that is, he provides evidence that proves his explanation right.
With the information above in mind, we can say Dr. X is convincing when he talks about how bacteria function and what can be done to prevent contamination. Option B is the correct answer.
The complete question with the answer choices can be found attached.
Learn more about food safety here:
brainly.com/question/934835
#SPJ1
The developmental pattern that a "how-to" essay would follow is a process analysis. The correct answer is option C. Process. This is a kind of essay that present directions; like how something should be done in order, or how something happened chronologically. It involves a step-by-step process from first to last.
Answer: the answer that was here before me had a bunch of paragraphs
and turns out it was theres more information here lol but the last paragraphs i put in my own words hope this helpes also if theres something that bothers u with this answer plz comment down below so that i can fix it! thanks! and Peace!
so I checked this on a plagiarism site and its 31% plagiarized so i went to a paraphrasing site - https:// quillbot.com - just get rid of the space - so once i paraphrased it here i went back to the plagiarism checker and it said zero percent plagiarized, i recommend doing this before getting a bad grade, also u dont have to change the topic but it would most likely be safer
also is ur looking for a plagiarism checker don't to Grammarly takes to long lol
ok also also - here's for example the same exact paragraph just with a changed topic and phrased differently -
My peers and I debated whether schools should have healthier lunches or not. We had several different viewpoints and views on the subject in our debate. By gathering background research on the subject, I prepared for this discussion. We had debates between my party. Not all of us were in agreement with each other. I listed several factual pieces of evidence that led to my point of view: I agree that on a daily basis, schools should have healthier lunches. - Healthier lunches means healthier kids - according to an online source. Not only would it be necessary to eat healthier but it would also keep children more focused in school.
I shared with my peers this truth. Many did not agree with me, however. We remained on the topic and discussed each other politely. In order to support my opinion, I found that I needed a good understanding of the subject and background study. Overall, with my fellow peers, this was a
very efficient debate. I enjoyed discussing my experience and my opinion and describing it. As we concentrated, I felt that I was profoundly connected to my peers. I talked animatedly as I explained my reasoning. I needed their attention to be drawn. My peers and I had a fruitful debate, as you can see.
Also this paragraph is posted by muah XR - so this is just an example, remember to rephrase it and put it in your own words and to change the topic thanks!
It's based on a boy the author saw during her day out with her child
D. They face problems with love.
