<u>Answer:
</u>
The state statutes would be the sources of law that the legal counsel would not need to consult.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The issue that the white house is concerned about is of direct national interest and has not much to do with the statutes of the states comprising the United States.
- Hence, in order to find a relevant interpretation, the counsel would most likely have to consult the federal statutes and international treaties associated with the issue.
Rodriguez compare his own attitudes towards reading to his parents' attitudes toward reading that they are not as intelligent as his teachers.
Paralleling the Rodriguez's education were the increasing contrary feelings Rodriguez was developing toward his parents. While he did not mean to be hurtful and rude towards them, he found that he was becoming angry when they did not seem to be with the same capabilities as his teachers have . Moreover as a student, Rodriguez looked toward his teachers, and not his parents, as the role models for him.
In this way he compared his own attitude as a scholarship boy with his parents.
To know more about Rodriguez here:
brainly.com/question/24393400
#SPJ4
I believe answer D is correct
Explanation:
In the case of presidential impeachment trials, the chief justice of the United States presides. The Constitution requires a two-thirds vote of the Senate to convict, and the penalty for an impeached official upon conviction is removal from office.
Option (D) the chief justice of supreme court
