Answer:
Poor working conditions gave rise to revolts and labor unions.
Explanation:
Are you asking who read his book? if so , I have
A historical source is <u>biased</u> when it can be deemed unreliable because the author appears to unfairly favor a particular side or viewpoint.
<h3>What is bias?</h3>
Bias refers to a historian's perspective being strongly for or against an issue.
Historical bias refers to when the information in the source can be clearly described as <u>unfair, unbalanced, or prejudiced</u>.
Thus, a historical source is <u>biased</u> when it can be deemed unreliable because the author appears to unfairly favor a particular side or viewpoint.
Learn more about a biased historical source at brainly.com/question/1614300
#SPJ1
Regarding the source, we can comment on the following.
- Because you forgot to attach the article, we do not know the content of it. However, we gladly can comment on the following general terms.
- The source of información has to be valid, and you have to cite it in your article.
- The validation of your article depends on the proper primary and secondary sources you cite as part of your arguments.
- That is the reason why the sources for the article influence the content of the article.
- Good sources mean a solid argument and more interest on the part of your readers.
- Bad or questionable sources mean that your article won't have the credibility needed to be accepted.
We conclude that is very important for the writer to include reliable primary and secondary sources in his article to impact the audience.
Learn more about this topic here:
brainly.com/question/336747?referrer=searchResults
To discuss political issues<span />
