The Historical Event Is The Invasion Of The Spanish Armada Of 1588
The enormous sea fleet sent by King Philip II of Spain in 1588 to invade England. England tried to counter this fleet by fighting entirely with heavy guns, and the failure of Spain’s Armada saved England from possible absorption into the Spanish empire.
This event is usually viewed with an overwhelming focus on the battle itself, showcasing the skills of the English fleet which was under the command of Charles Howard who battled the leadership of the experienced admiral Medina-Sidonia.
If we were to use the feminist critical literary theory the event would be viewed differently.
The Invasion Of The Spanish Armada Of 1588 happened during the Elizabethan Era, it was under her leadership that the Spanish Armada was defeated and she saved England from invasion, defending an invasion from the greatest European power of the age.
<em>¨I know I have the body of a weak, </em><em>feeble woman</em><em>; but I have the heart and stomach of a </em><em>king</em><em>, and of a </em><em>king of England</em><em> too.¨</em>
The feminist critical literary theory is a lense through which we can view a historical event. In literary criticism we may use reasoning, emotion and logic but it helps to try on different ¨lenses¨ to search for deeper meaning. Our view of the event may change if we are only concerned with the ways in which this event may reinforce or undermine the leadership of either the men or women involved or vice versa.
to show respect for her father as he exits the courtroom
I hope it is helpful for you .....
<h3>Please mark me as Brainliest </h3>
I haven't a full answer for you, but here's how I'd suggest you start it:
There's clear evidence of your theme in the lines "When the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept."
Reason being: Brutus only <em>told (verbally) </em>the people that Caesar was ambitious, giving <em>no </em>examples that are actual proof of how the great Julius Caesar acted. However, Mark Antony states right off the bat of what Caesar had done in his life-time. Antony decidedly debunks Brutus of any honourable traits as he continues with his Eulogy, as the more Antony says Brutus is "honourable," the more it is hypocritically placed. (<em>What I'm trying to say here is the more Antony says Brutus is honourable, it actually counter-intuitive, Antony is trying to take away any honour the horrible man had.)</em>
"A positive cool-headedness had come to him; it became now not the primary time he had been in a good place" is the excerpt from the story best supports her idea that Rainsford is a rational individual who does not panic under pressure.
A character can be showing rational behavior if she is retiring early in preference to staying at the organization and earning a paycheck if she feels the utility received from retiring early exceeds that of the paycheck.
That is part of the selection-making practice in which a person/employer's physical activities sensible desire making, which presents him with the most beneficial quantity of gain.
Think about the state of affairs in which you could be punished for questioning rationally, and rewarded for doing the opposite. In one experience of desirable, it is ideal in this example to suppose irrationally, but in any other experience, it remains accurate with the intention to suppose rationally, because rational wondering in itself is always appropriate.
Learn more about rational individuals here brainly.com/question/25870371
#SPJ4
