The presidential system selects a head of government independently of the legislature, while in contrast, the head of government in a parliamentary system answers directly to the legislature. Presidential systems necessarily operate under the regulations of separation of powers, while parliamentary methods do not.
<h3>What is the presidential state of government give an example?</h3>
A presidential system is a method of government where a head of government is also head of state and shows an executive branch that is different from the legislative branch. The United States, for instance, has a presidential system.
<h3>What is the difference of parliamentary and presidential?</h3>
In a parliamentary form of government, the powers are divided between the little head and the real head of the state. In a presidential form of government on the other hand the forces are concentrated in the hands of the single executive or the President of the nation.
To learn more about presidential system, refer
brainly.com/question/15453662
#SPJ9
It would be yemen. they have very little resources.
Answer:
D: to get enough soldiers
Explanation:
the main reason for drafting is because a country is in a war and needs all the soldiers they can get. soldiers keep dying and they need more of them so they force people to serve unless they leave or just physically can't because they have some disability.
Answer:
Log in
Sign up
American Foreign Policy
STUDY
PLAY
1) What was Washington's view of what US foreign policy ought to be? Why did he argue that nations should avoid antipathies and passionate attachments toward other nations? What should guide US foreign policy? Why?
He believed that the United States should have good relations with all countries but they should have not attachment to said countries. He believed that attachment to other countries would draw them into a war that they had no common interest being involved in. Antipathies also led to more frequent collisions and conflicts which is what the US did not want. Becoming friends with a stronger nation meant the weaker nation would become a satellite for the stronger one. In this case the US would be the weaker country and therefore the satellite. Promote trade and a commercial relationship but keep political connection at a minimum.
The US was weak at this time militarily and economically they had just been freed from British colonial control and needed trade only at this time
He believed that the United States should have good relations with all countries but they should have not attachment to said countries. He believed that attachment to other countries would draw them into a war that they had no common interest being involved in. Antipathies also led to more frequent collisions and conflicts which is what the US did not want. Becoming friends with a stronger nation meant the weaker nation would become a satellite for the stronger one. In this case the US would be the weaker country and therefore the satellite. Promote trade and a commercial relationship but keep political connection at a minimum.
The US was weak at this time militarily and economically they had just been freed from British colonial control and needed trade only at
Answer:
To try to strengthen the Soviet economy
Explanation:
The Soviet's didn't surrender to America. They called for peace after the US started shifting its relations to China. USSR felt threatened and eventually they both agreed to cut on weapons.
