1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Morgarella [4.7K]
3 years ago
9

URGENT

English
2 answers:
asambeis [7]3 years ago
8 0

The correct answers are Complete Subject: The ambassador from Cuba / Complete Predicate: pounded his fist on the table

Explanation:

In grammar, the subject of a sentence refers to the agent acting; on the other hand, the predicate includes the verb and other words that complemented it. Additionally, the complete subject includes the main word of the subject and all words that describe it and similarly, the complete predicate includes the verb and all words related to it. This means in the case presented the Complete predicate is "The ambassador from Cuba" because all of these words define the agent performing the action "pounded"; in the same way "pounded his fist on the table" is the complete predicate as it includes the main action and other details that explain it.

ollegr [7]3 years ago
4 0
Complete subject/ the ambassador from Cuba
complete predicate/ pounded his fist on the table
You might be interested in
Levi's homework is to write a report. He decides to write about his aquarium. He wants to tell readers how to set up an aquarium
sashaice [31]
By explaining problems and giving solutions! this is the best fit because the other two might make sense at a first glance, but only explaining problems and solutions would be an effective way to teach people how to set up an aquarium by giving them examples of what to do and what not to do whereas the others are just him talking about his aquarium.
7 0
3 years ago
3. What additional facts or clues did you gather in Part 2 of the story? State at least three additional relevant facts or clues
madreJ [45]

Sergei considers the goldfish to be his friend. From the statement, it is shown that Sergei has trust issues with other beings (May it be a human or animal). He may have a dreadful experience in the past that prevents him from befriending others. And he made an exception with the goldfish because he found out that the goldfish will not leave him even if he is troubled.

8 0
2 years ago
How are greasers different from hoods
GREYUIT [131]
The main difference between the greasers<span> and the </span>Socs is that they are from different<span> social classes.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What effect does Roosevelt hope to have on Americans with this appeal to emotion
Svet_ta [14]
He hopes for americans to empathize with the statement

6 0
3 years ago
Helllllpppppppppppppppppppp
alexandr402 [8]

Answer: usaa gicko and progressave

Explanation:

i took the test

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which piece of evidence best supports the idea that dehumanization increases immoral<br> behavior
    11·1 answer
  • a really strong statement to end an essay that talks about students should be allowed to use their cell phones during class​
    12·1 answer
  • 1. PART A: Which of the following
    9·1 answer
  • Match each part of an argument with its description.
    14·1 answer
  • The Dust Bowl During the 1930s, extreme drought and high winds made life incredibly difficult in the Great Plains region of the
    8·1 answer
  • ASAP
    14·2 answers
  • Sometimes you can tell right away that you’re looking at a poem. How? Because the lines will break before they reach the right m
    11·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP!!! IM BEING TIMED!!!!
    10·1 answer
  • Is it possible if a student can be a credible author?
    14·2 answers
  • 1. I am so hungry.- I ……………………………….. a sandwich.(prepare)
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!