1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ratelena [41]
3 years ago
6

What is the purpose of the Fugitive Slave Act?

History
1 answer:
nydimaria [60]3 years ago
7 0
 Fugitive Slave Act<span> of 1793 was a Federal </span>law<span> which was written with the intent to enforce Article 4, Section 2 of the United States Constitution, which required the return of runaway </span>slaves<span>. It sought to force the authorities in free states to return </span>fugitive slaves<span>to their masters.</span>
You might be interested in
Which branch of U.S. government is not directly established by the Constitution?
dexar [7]

The branch of the U.S. government that the Constitution did not directly establish is the C. Bureaucracy.

<h3>Which branches were established by the Constitution?</h3>

The Constitution established the legislative by establishing Congress and the Executive by establishing the roles of the President and their cabinet.

The Judiciary was established in Article III as well. The bureaucracy was not established by the Constitution but was provided for to help the government achieve its goals.

Find out more on the Constitution at brainly.com/question/15004627.

#SPJ1

8 0
1 year ago
In the United States corporations became the dominant form of business organization in the late 19th century mainly because of w
patriot [66]

Industries needed large amounts of capital.


7 0
2 years ago
Help!!!!
pav-90 [236]

Answer:

Mexican Americans

Explanation:

It is c. Did some research for you. Hope this helps.

5 0
3 years ago
If the War of 1812 is considered the “2nd war for independence”, then what would have happened to America if we would have lost?
SIZIF [17.4K]

Answer: prolly would've been added back into the british colonies

Explanation:

theres really no telling what would of happened between us,

6 0
3 years ago
I will give brainliest to the best answer
LuckyWell [14K]
It largely depends on what city state we are talking about. People at this time didn't identify as Greeks they were Thebans, Ionians, Athenians, Thracians and so on.

Syracuse and Corinth had well developed democratic systems and many of the other city states had democratic components. Even the militaristic duel monarchy of the Spartans had some democracy. The Spartan Ephors were elected and had enough power to exile kings if desired. Let's look at the most commonly cited city state though, Athens.

Athenians utilized a direct democracy compared to Roman republic and everything would be voted upon. Who would lead the armies, what kind of trade arrangements, who the diplomatic envoys would be; pretty much everything. Romans elected specific individuals to handle regional business like a representative of the people, the senators and provincial governors.
Athens was slightly more equal then the Roman system. Under the Athenian law all free citizens technically had equal rights in the government. In Rome the Patricians, Equestrians and Plebeians had strictly defined roles both legally and legislatively.
The reverse of the above point were the inclusiveness of the two systems. Athens had draconian regulations on who qualified as a free member of the city state. Rome comparatively welcomed a large swath of people and actively sought to latinize the frontiers.
Rome had two consistent political parties. Politics would be marked by conflict between the Conservatives and the Populares. Athens comparatively had many political blocks that were constantly evolving and changing beliefs.
The most distinct difference between the system is probably the adaptability of them though. The Roman system was extremely complex, but was constantly changing and adapting to meet the changing times. The Athenian system would become bogged down as time progressed and would essentially become little more then another oligarchy towards its end.
8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why we're the federalist, democratic-republican, democratic, and republican parties created?
    7·1 answer
  • In the years 1840-1850, which northeastern state has the largest white population
    11·1 answer
  • What did spain gain from helping the americans win the revolutionary war? aoex?
    13·2 answers
  • What was the presidential decision that freed slaves in confederate held territories?
    15·1 answer
  • What was the link between the launch of Sputnik I and the National Defense Educational Act?
    14·2 answers
  • Analogies for democracy
    15·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes the political structure of the ancient Aztecs?
    5·2 answers
  • 3. Give one example of a fungible good and one example of a non-fungible good. What is the
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following governments was the earliest to rule one china
    11·1 answer
  • A cell phone costs $435 and has a tax rate of 7%. How much tax is paid on the cell phone?
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!