1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Triss [41]
3 years ago
10

What date was the first appearance of the Black Death

History
2 answers:
kondor19780726 [428]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The Black Death was a devastating global epidemic of bubonic plague that struck Europe and Asia in the mid-1300s. The plague arrived in Europe in October 1347, when 12 ships from the Black Sea docked at the Sicilian port of Messina

Explanation:

Hope this helps:)

FrozenT [24]3 years ago
4 0

Answer: October 1347

Explanation: The Black Death was a devastating global epidemic of bubonic plague that struck Europe and Asia in the mid-1300s. The plague arrived in Europe in October 1347, when 12 ships from the Black Sea docked at the Sicilian port of Messina.

You might be interested in
More than __ million Acres have been burned in wildfire
salantis [7]
In California? Because as of Sep 8, 2020, 2 million acres have been burned.
8 0
3 years ago
How did the colonists use propaganda?
Marrrta [24]
By twisting in turning facts. For example the Boston tea party.<span />
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What type of bordered would likely have the most protection
kolezko [41]

Answer:

Any form of a national border would be protected

Explanation:

This is due there to prevent any form of smuggling illegal goods.

4 0
3 years ago
During which period did the domestication of animals and growing of crops first occur
Licemer1 [7]
Neolithic Period. Domestication of plants is a key indicator of that period's revolution
8 0
3 years ago
Develop four hypothesis of different ways to end the war with Japan. Be sure the suggestions are realistic and reflect the perio
Snezhnost [94]
One option can be a full military campaign based on sending soldiers to take Japanese territory. One advantage is that the number of killed civilians would be drastically lower while another would be that nuclear weaponry would not be used and would not destroy the environment. Disadvantage would be the high amount of soldier casualties and another can be possibly a very lengthy war effort.

Another option could be a complete blockade of Japan. Since it's an island, it would be possible to blockade it from all sides and wait for Japanese people to surrender since they wouldn't be able to sustain for long without importing things. One advantage would be preventing the death of Japanese civilians and preventing deaths of US troops. Disadvantages would be that might actually endure hardships and still wouldn't surrender, and another could be that they might fight like guerrillas and attack ships and American troops

Another option can be an allied assault in which the US could attack together with Soviets and split Japan like Germany. Advantage would be reduced amount of killed Japanese civilians and reduced amount of killed American troops. The disadvantage could be that a split Japan would be problematic like split Germany was because of Communism, and another could be that it would enable soviets to spread their influence even more throughout Asia

Fourth option could be having a demonstration of the power of nuclear weaponry somewhere safe. The United States could show what they are capable of in order to scare Japan into surrender. One advantage is that Japanese civilians would not be harmed and another can be that they would still show the world how strong the United States bombs are. One disadvantage could be that Japanese people might still not surrender since there were many who wanted to stay in the war even after the two nukes, and another disadvantage could be that Japan might began preparing for nuclear warfare since they would now know what awaits them

The best possible option could be as a recommendation the naval blockade. If a naval blockade was combined with bombardment of strategic military areas then Japan would inevitably surrender even though it would take a few months at least. It would cost a lot but it would save the lives of many people who didn't have to suffer because of their government.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Dont you guy think its complete bull sh*t that we have to pay for answers like wth
    8·2 answers
  • Why was the rise of the conservative movement significant?
    11·2 answers
  • What German monk believed that Christians had to live by faith alone and depend on the mercy of god ?
    7·2 answers
  • What was the point of slave codes?
    12·2 answers
  • Which was influenced by Montesquieu?
    13·2 answers
  • After World War I, who controlled Syria?
    7·1 answer
  • Which scenario best describes the Gilded Age (1870-1900)?
    9·1 answer
  • Why were outside influences seen as a threat to Ming China?
    12·2 answers
  • About religion
    10·1 answer
  • Hi can you pleasese help me with this qustion
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!