Nο, thе prοgram is <em>nοt statistically significant</em> bеcausе thе rеsults arе likеly tο οccur by chancе.
Yеs, thе prοgram is <em>practically significant</em> bеcausе thе amοunt οf lοst wеight is largе еnοugh tο bе cοnsidеrеd practically significant.
The policy owner normally pays the premium whilst the insured could technically be himself or also another person he is paying the insurance for. For example a father paying medical insurance for the entire family. THere he would be policy owner but also the rest of the family would be insured.
Complete Question :
Michael is in sales meeting with a potential client. The client is interested in the
product but is concerned that the product costs 15% more than the competitor's.
How should Michael handle this sales situation?
A.) Offer the client a 20% discount.
B.) Ask the client how much he or she would be willing to pay for the product.
C.) Show the client the better warranty and quality that comes with the slightly
higher cost.
D.) Say "Thanks for your time" and leave
Answer: C.) Show the client the better warranty and quality that comes with the slightly
higher cost.
Explanation: The fact that Michael's product costs 15% more than the price of it's competitor doesn't spell the end of the deal. What Michael needs to explain and make clear to the client in the sales meeting are the vague distinctions which exists between what his own product offering and that of it's competitors. Michael needs to let the potential buyers understand and get clearly the additional offers, quality or performance associated with his own product which ultimately accounts for the higher cost of his own product.
Eugene should not be upset because HIS PROPERTY VALUE HAS INCREASE. Sale tax refers to the consumption tax imposed by the government on the sales of goods and services at the point of sale. An increase in sale tax will automatically increase the value of the land and the house that Eugene has in that area. If he sells the land later or rent out the house, he will make more money from the sale.
Answer: 3.50 years
Explanation:
The Payback period is a method of checking the viability of a project. It measures how long it will take a project to pay back it's initial investment.
Formula is;
= Year before payback + Cash remaining till payback/ Cash inflow in year of payback
Year 1 Net Cash Inflow
= Cash Inflow - Cash Outflow
= 30,000 - 12,000
= $18,000
Year 2
= 45,000 - 20,000
= $25,000
Year 3
= 60,000 - 25,000
= $35,000
Year 4
= 50,000 - 30,000
= $20,000
Year 1 + 2 + 3
= 18,000 + 25,000 + 35,000
= $78,000
Amount remaining till payback
= Investment - Cash inflow so far
= 88,000 - 78,000
= $10,000
= Year before payback + Cash remaining till payback/ Cash inflow in year of payback
= 3 + 10,000/20,000
= 3.50 years
