1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
RSB [31]
2 years ago
15

What would be one colonial advantage to referring to this event as “The Bloody Massacre? (In other words, how could this inciden

t benefit the colonists by referring to it as a bloody massacre?)
a. in order to gain support for the British king
b. in order to give the colonists a common cause against Britain, and separate from it
c. in order to blame colonists for the event
d. in order to make Bostonians seem weak
History
1 answer:
Nutka1998 [239]2 years ago
8 0
The answer would be B because this would make everyone think that it was the fault of the British, and giving them a stronger reason to separate from England.
You might be interested in
What is the name for the trading of slaves within the boundaries of the United States
Ket [755]
Answer: The domestic slave trade, also known as the Second Middle Passage and the interregional slave trade, was the term for the domestic trade of slaves within the United States that reallocated slaves across states during the antebellum period.

Hope this helps :)
3 0
3 years ago
who was the leader who imprisoned in the fight against apartheid & later became president of south africa?
Talja [164]

Answer:

Nelson Rolihlahla Mandela

5 0
2 years ago
Why had the government under the Articles of Confederation had not worked<br> well?
xxTIMURxx [149]

 because fear ran through people due to a strong government but the articles kept a weak as possible

7 0
2 years ago
Definition of progressiviness
lidiya [134]
I think it determines your progress at something. It determines on what you can, or need to improve, or possibly change.
6 0
3 years ago
Which is a reason that a plant from a rain forest biome would not survive in a desert biome?
ruslelena [56]
If plants in the rainforest and desert were able to share what they each have in abundance, rainforests would be less lush and deserts greener. Plants in the rainforest compete to reach the sun with broad leaves and tall stems, while desert plants evolved to store water. Most rainforests receive more than 100 inches of rain annually, while deserts barely collect 10 inches of precipitation a year in a good year, with periods of droughts frequently occurring. These drastic differences caused the plants within these two biomes to develop and adapt to their distinctive living conditions in different ways to help them thrive.
3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • If Cherisse could travel to southern Africa in the year 1400 CE, which civilization would she find?
    14·1 answer
  • Could slaves become citizens in Athens and Rome?
    14·1 answer
  • Patrick Henry once famously said “I am not a Virginian, but an American!” For someone so patriotic, why do you think Patrick Hen
    8·1 answer
  • graph shows the number of people who immigrated to the United States from different parts of the world between 1820 and 2010. Ba
    7·2 answers
  • What were the primary benefits of the Louisiana purchase
    9·1 answer
  • What was the main reason the Persian went to war with greece
    11·1 answer
  • What are the cause and effects of the Reagan Years?
    13·1 answer
  • What was the reason for the split between Shia and Sunni Muslims?
    13·1 answer
  • Businesses are usually intrested and promoting growth because it?
    5·2 answers
  • ¿Por qué el sistema de los EEUU es incompatible al de la URSS?
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!