Assuming you're pro-Columbus day, these are points that can be made:
Being historically accurate, Columbus day should be celebrated because he attempted and was successful at colonizing and helping America grow.
A common argument trying to counter being pro-Columbus day is the mention of killing Native Americans, so you can mention that diseases had already existed and were the primary cause of death in the New Land rather than Natives being killed (keep in mind though that disease and murder were both factors).
Another Pro argument that could be made is the fact that yes, vikings DID find America first, however Columbus helped Americas economy, etc.
Assuming you're anti-Columbus day, these are more points:
What Christopher Columbus did to Native Americans is unjust, essentially he took land from the Natives and they were forced to convert and change their lifestyle in order to work with Columbus or were killed; brutality is unacceptable.
The day itself should be focused on the Native American victims of Columbus.
The vikings technically found the New Land.
I hope this helped a little! :)
The statement which is not true about <span>Thomas Hobbes and John Locke is:
</span>
Most of the Founders of the United States had read both Hobbes and Locke but were strongly influenced by Locke.
Because <span>Hobbes and Locke were both influential in the development of social contract theory.</span>
Answer:
The enemies had AK47s and we had m1 garands which were inferior to there automatic rifles and many us citizens disapproved of the war so the U.S had less numbers than other armies and finally the enemy also knew their terrain so they could hide and ambush their enemies or catch them by surprise.
Explanation:
