There's multiple reasons for the lack of unity between the Indian tribes against the European invasion and expansion on their territory. The Indians were divided into multiple groups, some of which had already had problems and bad blood between them, so alliances between tribes like that were not the first choice in mind. Also, the Europeans played well tactically, by promising some of the tribes certain things if they ally with them, so once the Europeans managed to get what they wanted they were turning against their Indian allies who were pretty much isolated bu that point because of their actions. The conquering of new territories by the Europeans also was very big factor, because they managed to cut the connections between the tribes, thus not allowing them to be able to create alliances and be united against them.
Answer:
Philosophically,i would say that people may say they trust somebody completely or with all their heart, but their brain may still have restraints or concerns on the truth of telling somebody, even if they are the most trustworthy person you may know. However, trust is also non-materialistic so it is up to you to decide you trust anybody 'completely'
Explanation:
Answer:
Yes, answer below!
Explanation:
Yes, he had done several actions against the constitution and overall led to the capital being attacked. He was a major leader and role model, some people would believe whatever he said; and sometimes he said some terrible things. Another topic is how he built part of a wall wasting our governments money just to keep people out when we should be making the regulations larger so we are able to let immigrants come in regulated amounts safely.
If you want to add more or not use it is just fine! It is my personal opinion, but it seems fair.
