Why are the results from neurocorrelational studies considered speculative?

2 answers:

5 0

The results from neurocorrelational studies are considered speculative because the accuracy of the behavioral tests in the assessment of functional and anatomical activity cannot be confirmed.

Explanation:

Distinct behavioral tests are often observed to produce distinct results. It is due to this difference in the results of the assessment of functional and anatomical activities becomes a difficult task. In such situations the method of neurocorrelation is brought into use.

Komok [63]3 years ago

4 0

Neuropsychological tests are the methods by which neurobehavioral tests are evoked, and particular test scores speak to outline articulations about watched practices and subjective capacities. So we can state that these are speculative in light of the fact that we can't be certain that the tests precisely evaluate the real anatomical and useful action of the cerebrum district under investigation.

You might be interested in

Using complete sentences, name the four districts found in most large cities.

DanielleElmas [232]

The four parts of a city include the central business district, residential districts, commercial districts, and industrial districts. Different activities take place in each of these types of districts. The central business district often is called a city’s downtown area. Make sure to leave a like for my answer. Looking for five stars and thanks pls.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What was the name given to communities built on the idea that everyone who lived in the community shared everything; each member

umka2103 [35]

I believe the answer is a communist community built on the idea that everybody shares everything compared to a capitalist community where you earn/ buy your own things.

7 0

2 years ago

Driving his motorcycle negligently, Joe crashes into a streetlight. The streetlight falls onto Kim, who is standing nearby, kill

Elina [12.6K]

Answer:

The cause in fact

Explanation:

There is a claim for negligence but the plaintiff has to prove that whatever happened because of negligence. The following elements are there that help in proving that happening because of negligence.

The defendant owed the plaintiff, the duty of the care.
The defendant has to breach the duty of the care.
The duty of the defendant will be the cause of the injury for the plaintiff.

To prove the negligence the plaintiff needs cause in fact causation to have to show that they do not injure without the defendant's actions.

5 0

3 years ago

To whom do you think does the voice from the heaven belong?give evidence to support your answer?

gogolik [260]

Answer:

God's voice

Explanation:

read the bible

4 0

2 years ago

Lisa and Sam ask a job applicant to talk about her background for a few minutes. Before doing so, the applicant says she has bad

Arisa [49]

Answer:

Sam is more likely to not get the job

Explanation:

8 0

2 years ago