The main reason why a freedman would agree to become a sharecropper is because although he was free, he was usually very poor and lacked the funds to buy farming equipment and land of his own.
Answer:
A claim supporting Linda brown and three reasons is written below in brief detailed explanation.
Explanation:
The extensive statement was presented to support the assertion that legal segregation happened in both fundamentally inequitable education and weak self-esteem between minority learners. The Brown family lawyers claimed that segregation by law indicated that African Americans were genetically secondary to whites.
<span>Patrick
Henry in his "Speech at the Convention of Virginia" says that all
peaceful ways to negotiate with the British, have already been made, and
were also useless, since they have already argued their rights, then
they have protested, and the protests were harshly repressed, they have been prostrated before the British throne, and have even begged; but in response, the Colonists have been despised and insulted by the king. Therefore, Henry says in his famous speech, that the settlers can not abandon their struggle for their freedom; and although there are losses and sacrifices, they are for a greater cause. <span>That's when he calls the fight to all Americans.</span></span>
Answer:
<u>Because even if the Absolutism has similarities and was applied in almost the entire Europe, each country modeled its conceptions to adapt to reality. </u>And this reality could be <u>social, political or religious.</u>
Explanation:
I believe that the better way to understand this point is analyzing the two major countries where the Absolutism was strong: France and England.
- France was ruled by Louis XIV in the 17th century. He describes himself as "The state is me" (“L'Etat c'est Moi”). This monarch is the main definition of the absolutist ruler. <u>To support his government, Louis XIV follows the idea of Divine Right of Kings which argued that the monarch had divine powers and was elected by God. Thus, his actions and laws were divine and couldn't be disrespected. </u>The question is: why this conception worked in France? <u>Because it was a catholic country, and religious perceptions were followed without question. Plus, Louis XIV had no limits in his powers. I mean, there was no law or political scheme that could limit him.</u>
- On the contrary, in England, <u>the king was subjected to the Parlament. </u>However, only this restriction was not sufficed to limit his power. The main point is that the British kings <u>followed the idea of a social contract (popularized by the philosopher Thomas Hobbes). </u>This idea attests that <u>a king has duties with its people,</u> and the Parlament was always remembering him about this. So, he couldn't do whatever he wanted.
Answer:
On July 27, 1793, Robespierre was elected to the Committee of Public Safety, which was formed in April to protect France against its enemies, foreign and domestic, and to oversee the government. Under his leadership, the committee came to exercise virtual dictatorial control over the French government.
