1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
alexandr1967 [171]
2 years ago
9

What country pulled ahead of the us in the “space race”?

History
1 answer:
fiasKO [112]2 years ago
5 0
The USSR, they launched a satellite in to space called Sputnik in the 1950's
You might be interested in
What was david known for
Semmy [17]
Frist King in Jerusalem and also a fighter and a singer of Israel
7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following sets most accurate
Reil [10]

Answer:

I can't see it

Explanation:

the thingjanssnnsmamamamsms

4 0
2 years ago
(NEED HELP) In this assignment, you will write a three- to four-paragraph Supreme Court opinion for
liberstina [14]

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, Diane D. Kirstein, U .S. Attorney's Office, San Antonio, TX, Plaintiff–Appellee. Laura G. Greenberg, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Bradford W. Bogan, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Maureen Scott Franco, Federal Public Defender, M. Carolyn Fuentes, Federal Public Defender's Office, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant–Appellant.

In this case, we must decide whether the district court's imposition of a condition of supervised release prohibiting the defendant from “residing or going to places where a minor or minors are known to frequent without prior approval of the probation officer” was plainly erroneous. We conclude it was not and AFFIRM.

I.

In January 1990, Michael Fields was convicted in Wisconsin state court of second degree sexual assault of a child.1 He was sentenced to five years in prison, but only served one year; the rest of his term was probated. Fields was required to register as a sex offender in Wisconsin for the rest of his life. Because of this conviction, he must also register as a sex offender in Texas. Fields has thrice been arrested and convicted for failing to register as a sex offender.2 He has also been repeatedly told by state authorities in both Wisconsin and Texas that he must register as a sex offender, instructions with which it appears he has never complied.3

Fields was arrested by the Austin Police Department for failing to register as a sex offender in April 2013. The next month, he was indicted in federal court and charged with one count of failing to register as a sex offender in violation of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (“SORNA”).4 After unsuccessfully moving to dismiss the indictment on the grounds that SORNA was unconstitutional, Fields pled guilty in July 2013.

In November 2013, Fields appeared before the district court for his sentencing hearing. At that hearing, the court reviewed Fields's criminal history record, and concluded that, even discounting several convictions where it was disputed as to whether Fields committed the crime, he had “a solid criminal record since 1974.” After hearing from counsel, the court then sentenced Fields to a 27–month sentence of imprisonment, followed by ten years of supervised release. The supervision included a number of conditions, including, as relevant here, a requirement that:

The defendant shall follow all other lifestyle restrictions or treatment requirements imposed by the therapist, and continue those restrictions as they pertain to avoiding risk situations throughout the course of supervision. This includes not residing or going to places where a minor or minors are known to frequent without prior approval of the probation officer.

Fields did not object to this condition. This timely appeal follows.

II.

We normally review conditions of supervised release for abuse of discretion.5 In this case, because Fields did not object to his supervised release condition while before the district court, we review for plain error.6 As the Supreme Court has made clear, plain error is a demanding standard:

6 0
3 years ago
Mosaic law taught "an eye for an eye and tooth for a tooth," which seems an antiquated form of justice in the very
iVinArrow [24]

Over the years and with the constant evolution of society, it is normal for some of the rights of humanity to be reformulated and even replaced by better rights and more consistent with the well-being of society.

As seen above, the Mosaic Law "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth", stipulated that an individual had to pay their crimes in the same currency. Thus, if a person killed someone, they should be punished with death. Currently, this concept is completely replaced by basic human rights that are defended by the "Universal Declaration of Human Rights", which states that everyone has the right to life and security, regardless of their crimes.

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
*30 POINTS* PLZZ EXPLAIN YOUR ANSWER
sergeinik [125]

Answer:

The colonial responses to British policies after the French and Indian War can be classified as violent or nonviolent. Hence, we have

Non Violent responses to be the following

Committees of Correspondence: this was formed in 1764, and it was a means of a series of dialogue among patriot leaders throughout the American colonies. The purpose is to unite the colonies in opposition to the British Parliament. It is nonviolent in nature.

Non-Importation Movement: this was formed after the Sugar Act of 1764 and the Stamp Act of 1765. And it is a form of protest by the American colonists for the purpose of boycotting the British goods in an effort to change imperial policy. It involves the abstinence of the American colonists from purchasing or consuming imported tea and other goods. It is nonviolent in nature

Stamp Act Congress: which was conducted in 1765, was the first meeting of the representatives from various American colonies to conduct a unified protest against British taxation, including the petition of the king and Parliament for change the objectionable measures. It is nonviolent in nature

While the violent response is the

Boston Massacre: this occurred in the year 1770. And it was a street fight or open and physical confrontation involving the British soldiers shooting killing several people while being harassed by the American colonists' mob who chose to throw harmful objects like snowballs, stones, and sticks, towards the British soldiers in Boston.

Explanation:

8 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Who led the Tiananmen Square protest in 1989.
    5·1 answer
  • This is a person is part of a religious denomination who has the Pope as its leader.
    10·2 answers
  • "Theodore c. Sorensen's memorandum, October 18, 1962." List the possible courses of action, including some advantages and disadv
    14·1 answer
  • Factories and mills in the early nineteenth century employed woman and children as well as men. Which statements are true about
    5·2 answers
  • How did Roosevelt try and get around the Supreme Court to push through New Deal legislation?
    15·1 answer
  • What is the iran-contra scandal
    13·2 answers
  • Many of the foundations of classical Greek culture emerged during the time when
    11·2 answers
  • What type of government did the leaders of Roman Republic establish
    9·1 answer
  • Please helpppppp! Pleaseee
    15·1 answer
  • Why did the Founding Fathers include the Commerce Clause as a power granted to Congress in the new United States
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!