1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Serjik [45]
3 years ago
7

Why might alexander hamilton, a supporter of a strong national government, be surprised at the scope of the powers of the nation

al government today?
History
1 answer:
Jlenok [28]3 years ago
3 0
Hamilton would've been stunned at the float toward the privileged mindset. He generally trusted that legitimacy was the place you earned your way in life. His perspective of the national government was for shielding the U.S. from remote interests and to encourage trade between the states.Just like we shouldn't accuse the creator of flame of individuals who torch houses, Hamilton was astute in making an Executive branch that had the ability to complete what should have been finished. The American nationals are in charge of who we choose and how we permit them to proceed with their wayward courses now and again.
You might be interested in
What was the federal reserve act designed to prevent?
dezoksy [38]
It was created to prevent....
( Financial Panics )

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are some Programs that came out of the New Deal.
Vladimir79 [104]

Answer:

Many new deal programs remain active

Explanation: some are atheist federal Corp insurance corporation. (FCIC), the FDA federal housing administration, and the FHA the TheTennesse Valley Authority

4 0
3 years ago
The separation of power or three branches of government was a key idea in
Hitman42 [59]
Didn’t let one branch have more power than the other
7 0
3 years ago
in Schenck v. United States when did the supreme court say speech could be more dangerous to the country
Len [333]

The correct answer is During a time of war.

The Schenck vs. United States Supreme Court case deals with the issue of freedom of speech during the World War I era. In this case, Schenck was using his freedom of speech to convince people to avoid the military draft that was taking place in the United States. The Supreme Court ruled that this is not protected free speech, as this speech presented a clear and present danger to American society, especially since this was done during World War I.

8 0
4 years ago
In the 2000 presidential election, __________ won the presidency despite losing the __________ vote. A. Al Gore . . . Popular B.
blsea [12.9K]

Answer:

The answer is George Bush and Popular vote

Explanation:

This is how Donald Trump won in 2016 actually tho he lost the Popularity vote.  This also proves that this isnt a democracy (also look it up Donald trump and George bush did this). ANYWAYS BYE :D

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS WILL MARK BRAINLIEST
    14·1 answer
  • What was the combined effect of both the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Nuremberg Trials?
    11·2 answers
  • Max’s decision to help Thomas was based on which approach?
    7·2 answers
  • What percentage of the population did the Black Death wipe out in some parts of China?​
    11·1 answer
  • Please help 50 points
    12·1 answer
  • Written in response to the Townshend
    12·1 answer
  • What are U.S. current allies
    15·1 answer
  • Which of all four gospels wrote a story including the birth of Jesus Christ?
    14·2 answers
  • What was a direct effect of increased food production during europe’s agricultural revolution?.
    6·1 answer
  • Use the following terms to describe the struggle for power that developed between kings and nobles: Magna Carta, common law, hab
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!