A careful reading of the history of the “idea” of family preservation as well as an appraisal of the recent policy context for its adoption—as illuminated by Berry (1997), Schorr (1997), McCroskey and Meezan (1997), and others—suggests that all three explanations—dissensus on values, practice lacunae, and organizational complexities—may to a degree be valid. At a minimum, these and other trenchant commentaries such as those provided recently by Littell and Schuerman (1999) and Halpern (1999) suggest that any discussion of the “practice” of family preservation absent its historical/valuative roots and current organizational and policy context will be incomplete.
That said, this present paper will focus on some of the most vexing challenges of implementing family preservation practice, some of its enduring legacies as a practice modality, and some of the longer range problems in developing practice theory and application that it has illuminated
Answer:
A. 1st amendment
Explanation:
“Judicial review of the way in which religious schools discharge those responsibilities would undermine the independence of religious institutions in a way that the First Amendment does not tolerate.”
Answer:
licensing agreement
Explanation:
According to my research on common legal contracts, I can say that based on the information provided within the question the document is an example of a licensing agreement. This type of contract allows the person signing the right to use in any way the technology or anything else that is patented and owned by the person providing the license.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
a. the reasons for our attitudes or feelings are ambiguous
Explanation:
The Self-perception theory suggests that individuals tend to perceive their own behaviors as good or bad or acceptable or unacceptable and then this affects their own feelings and attitudes. In addition to this fact, it has also been reported that people tend to infer their attitudes and their preferences based on their behaviors not only when they are observing themselves but also when they are behaving unconsciously. This means that people infer feelings from their own behavior and actions and since these feelings can be interpreted in multiple ways hence they are ambiguous. Therefore, option a is the correct answer.