Answer: In year three the preferred stockholders would receive $7,000 and the common stockholders would receive $25,000.
Explanation: Preferred stockholders are always paid before common stockholders. Since this stock in cumulative it means that when there is not enough income in one year to pay the preferred stock then the company needs to pay them when they have the money in the future.
In this case the preferred stock is 5% of $100 par value and is cumulative. This means that every year the company needs to pay 5% times $100 par value on each stock, and there is 1,000 shares, so the total is $5,000 in preferred stock dividends.
In year one and two they did not declare enough dividends to pay this full amount. In year one they declared $2,000 and year two they declared $6,000. At the end of year two they should have received $10,000, but only received $8,000. In year three they need to pay the preferred stockholders the $2,000 that are in arrears, plus the $5,000 for year three, for a total of $7,000. Since there was $32,000 in dividends declared and $7,000 is going to the preferred stockholders, it means that there is $25,000 left for the common stockholders. $25,000/10,000 shares equals $2.50 dividend per share.
Answer:
The correct answer is B. of fluctuations in the demand for reserves.
Explanation:
The management of the interest rate is perhaps one of the areas of economic policy that has raised the most controversy among policymakers. Much of it comes from both the interpretation of the role that the interest rate plays in macroeconomic adjustment, and the real possibility of achieving effective control over it.
Regarding the role of the interest rate, there are opposing positions about the influence that this variable may have on that of termination of savings investment. Thus, for example, from a Keynesian perspective, a weak relationship is raised between saving the interest rate, since it depends primarily on the level of income, while great importance is attached to this variable as a determinant of investment. Under this scheme, control over the interest rate can be justified since it would have the advantage of stimulating economic activity through greater investment, without significantly affecting savings levels.
Answer:
the answer is D hope that helps you out
