There's lots of evidence that show that the ''Great leap forward'' was a big failure. The most evident ones were the increased poverty of the Chinese population, the bad economic planning that was making enormous troubles to China just to survive, the very common starvation because of lack of food because of bad planning, closing the country's market for trade.
They are unrelated. Present day traditionalists are attached to guaranteeing that the Second Amendment was made so the nationals could oppose oppression and help battle to protect the Constitution, including the First Amendment. It wasn't. This is revisionist history. It was made to keep Congress and Congress alone from restricting the privilege to remain battle ready, which would keep the states from setting up local armies utilizing residents' weapons.
Actually, the states dependably had the ability to direct guns any way they needed, in light of the fact that at first, the Second Amendment didn't make a difference to them by any means. They likewise had the ability to confine discourse and the press et cetera, on the grounds that the First Amendment didn't have any significant bearing to them either.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Because they were just fulfilling their manifest destiny and trying to stop Britain from ruining their manifest destiny
They wanted the areas that produced more gold.
The territory that was annexed by Germany <span>between 1938 and 1939 is Austria. In an excerpt from the history.com:
"</span><span>On March 12, 1938, </span>German<span> troops march into </span>Austria<span>to annex the </span>German<span>-speaking nation for the Third Reich. In early 1938, </span>Austrian<span> Nazis conspired for the second time in four years to seize the </span>Austrian government by force and unite their nation with Nazi Germany<span>."</span>