1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
max2010maxim [7]
4 years ago
8

Explain why the Missouri Compromise line did not provide a solution to the problem of California's' statehood.

History
2 answers:
Tema [17]4 years ago
4 0

The Missouri Compromise (1820) was supposed to help settle the issue of slavery in the new territories acquired by the United States. In this compromise, the 36'30 line was established. Any new territory that was added to the US that was north of this line would be considered a free state. Any new territory that was added to the US that was south of this line would be considered a slave state. This line caused a significant problem for California because the 36'30 cut California into two pieces. At this time, having a half free half slave state was not an option. This is why this compromise did not solve the issue of California statehood.

vichka [17]4 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The admission of California into statehood upset the balance of power between free states and slave states.

Explanation:

The admission of California gave the free estates a larger part in both the Senate and the place of delegates. This made it workable for enactment to be passed in Congress without the assent of the southern slave states.  

The equalization was to evacuate the Mason Dixon line as a subjective limit between northern free states and southern slave states. The trade off of 1850 likewise enormously fortified the outlaw slave acts. Gotten away black slaves would never again be sheltered anyplace in the United States. Joined with the Dred Scott choice of the Supreme Court slavery could now be viewed as legitimate anyplace in the United States.

The Compromise made the south furious on the grounds that the south dreaded the administrative power it provided for the northern free states. The Compromise made the north furious in light of the fact that the north expected that slavery would spread into beforehand free state regions. The two sides expected that the country would never again be separated among slave and free however that the opposite side would win. The country was currently uneven on account of the trade off of 1850 and would turn out to be either totally free or totally slave.

You might be interested in
Explain how Executive Order 9066 limited the Civil Rights of some Americans.
adell [148]

Answer:

The President Authorizes Japanese Relocation. In an atmosphere of World War II hysteria, President Roosevelt, encouraged by officials at all levels of the federal government, authorized the internment of tens of thousands of American citizens of Japanese ancestry and resident aliens from Japan.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Folk architecture is very much determined by the ________________ and natural ________________ available.
Step2247 [10]

Answer:

environment; resources would be the correct answer

4 0
4 years ago
What would happen if the national law were not supreme?
Elina [12.6K]
If we did not have the protection of Constitutional Rights there would be regional pockets of intolerance where the prevailing majorities would pass laws that violate the rights of the minorities. There would be no balance. It is part of human nature for the powerful to take advantage, and control, of the less powerful in order to further their own desires and self interests. If that were to happen we would descend into a quagmire of hodge-podge laws and we would lose <span>the stability and intelligence of the national framework of equality we now experience. </span>
4 0
3 years ago
3. Describe the outcome of the Chinese Civil War.
sertanlavr [38]

Answer:

The Chinese Revolution of 1949. ... The announcement ended the costly full-scale civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the Nationalist Party, or Kuomintang (KMT), which broke out immediately following World War II and had been preceded by on and off conflict between the two sides since the 1920's.

5 0
3 years ago
Why did Constantine move the capital city to Byzantium?
Tresset [83]

Answer:

idk why?

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In economics why is sand considered a resource
    15·2 answers
  • Which type of jail holds individuals accused of crimes like trespassing and misconduct
    13·2 answers
  • How did polk try to resolve the california issue without bloodshed?
    10·1 answer
  • What is one weakness of Articles of Confederation?
    7·2 answers
  • Please i need it now asap
    9·2 answers
  • What is 8n,0 in longitude and latitude
    15·1 answer
  • How would a mill-town become a ghost town in the early 1900s?
    7·1 answer
  • What
    14·1 answer
  • WORLD WAR 1 QUESTIONS...Which term best describes what life was like for the soldiers in the trenches? A- exciting B- dramatic C
    13·2 answers
  • List the fundamental freedoms that it guaranteed. Which free doms do you think are more important ?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!