1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
steposvetlana [31]
2 years ago
13

Was the cost of the war higher for the north or the south?Be sure to consider the social,political,economic cost of the war and

support your choice! Include at least two specific pieces of evidence from the lesson to support your response
History
1 answer:
tatyana61 [14]2 years ago
6 0
I believe your talking about the civil war, so the cost of the war would be higher for the south because they lost and with that they also lost their slaves which did all the work but since there were no more “workers” they had to make up for loss crops a different way
You might be interested in
What protected Egypt from an invasion?​
Tju [1.3M]

Answer:

The Egyptians were protected from invaders due to their geographical features.

Explanation:

They had the Mediterranean Sea to the north along with the Nile Delta. This body of water blocks off land on the other side. Furthermore, the cataracts in the Nile to the south protected the Egyptians from lands below them.

4 0
2 years ago
What was the Congress of Vienna and what was its purpose?
Dvinal [7]
It was made by europe people to create/order a balance of power they wanted to turn it back to the way things were
8 0
3 years ago
WILL MARK BRAINIEST What responsibility did President Kennedy have for resolving the Cuban Missile Crisis, and what was the role
vaieri [72.5K]

Explanation:

After many long and difficult meetings, Kennedy decided to place a naval blockade, or a ring of ships, around Cuba. The aim of this "quarantine," as he called it, was to prevent the Soviets from bringing in more military supplies. He demanded the removal of the missiles already there and the destruction of the sites.

3 0
2 years ago
Why are secondary sources important to the study of history?
lukranit [14]
Well, if a primary source says that a country one a historic battle, and we find rope and unfired weapons and a large amount of bones inside of the rope area, then the primary source is then questioned.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the primary goal of the formation of the united nations
BartSMP [9]
The United Nations ultimate goal was peace and to replace the unsuccessful League of Nations.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Most Americans wanted the U.S to remain neutral at the start of WWII.<br> O True<br> O False
    7·2 answers
  • Jefferson agreed to buy French land to the west so that
    13·1 answer
  • Which statement about the United sates' entry to world war II is true?
    13·1 answer
  • How did World War I affect the social, political, and economic status of women? (for dbq thesis)
    15·1 answer
  • What are the names of two highly respected men who were Federalists?
    15·1 answer
  • Why did political parties form in the United States
    9·2 answers
  • What is the stance of other Middle Eastern nations in regards to the<br> conflict?
    11·1 answer
  • Which two agricultural contributions are common to both Northeast Woodland Indians and Southeast Indians?
    12·1 answer
  • Make a list of choices you think ordinary Germans could have made in response to the boycott. What might have been the consequen
    15·1 answer
  • Following Genghis Khan death his grandson Kublai Khan succeeded in
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!