The greatest difference between the 14 points and the ToV is the blame for the war. In the ToV Germany is blamed for the war and the Treaty is more a sentence than terms of an armistice, to where the 14 points was more a negotiated settlement for an armistice. The 14 points may have included and recognized the new German and would have brought that government into the negotiation process. Many aspects would have been difficult for Germany to agree to but instead of the agreement being forced upon them the new German government would have played a role in the resolution. It was the Germans that first accepted the 14 points for an armistice, knew the terms, and exiled there emperor I believe that there would have been strong support to honor the agreement by the German people. The ToV on the other hand was made to punish the Germans, Breakup the German Empire, and have the Germans pay for the war. It was also made to negate the role played by Wilson and the USA in the war. The ToV also allowed the Allied powers to keep their colonies and only the German colonies were, in some point in time, to be open for autonomous rule. The 14 points might have prevented WW2, the ToV was the punishment that bound the German people together to avenge the disgrace.
I hope I helped!
Answer:
In around 1045- 256 B.C.E., the Zhou dynasty ruled over China. They used a form of government called feudalism to keep China stable. In feudalism, the king starts out with all of the land. He then sells large portions of his land to people called lords in exchange for soldiers when the king is attacked.
The ability to think and use there hands
Answer:
abbasid
Explanation:
goo.gle the exact question with "quiz.let" at the end --- thats how i do a lott of my stuff
