Judicial activism is the act of passing ruling in a court not according to the law, but to personal beliefs and preferences. The opposite of judicial activism is judicial restraint, in which the judges follow the constitution exactly and abstain from passing ruling not specified in the constitution.
Answer:
I believe it is to avoid military conflict, and still getting North Korea to change their Nuclear Weapon Policies and to stop North Korea from all spending on their military.
Explanation:
North Korea seemed to spend a lot of what they have on the Military. Foreigners to North Korea, that were for the most part, part of NATO wanted to help that happen without getting into some sort of nuclear conflict. They also wanted to change nuclear weapon policies, as the START treaty was in place between the US and Russia during Obama's first term of presidency I believe, and at the time leader, and current leader, Vladimir Putin has grown to like. So they wanted to talk to North Korea about it too.
Explanation:
International relations allows nations to cooperate with one another, share information as a way to face global issues that go beyond any particular country or region.
