A social problem is defined as a negative situation that affects all individuals in the same society.
A social problem such as unemployment, affects the life of the individual and society in relevant ways.
- Consequences of unemployment for the individual:
- Development of mental illnesses such as anxiety and depression.
2. Consequences of unemployment for society:
- Greater population impoverishment.
Therefore, it is concluded that each social problem generates negative consequences that directly affect individual and collective life, such as the example of unemployment, there are direct consequences on the individual's quality of life, such as the development of psychological problems that lead to greater demotivation and it can lead to more serious health problems.
In the social sphere, unemployment increases the formation of underemployment, which harms the economy of a country as a whole, due to the absence of fundamental rights and absence of contribution, which contributes to an economic recession and negative aspects such as increased crime and insecurity.
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/12826281
There are several reasons why group problem-solving and decision making is more likely to produce the correct answer than in an individual setting.
One reason is that groups who act in a cooperative manner tend to do better than individuals, who are in a more competitive atmosphere. Group interaction facilitates collaboration, fresh ideas, and improved solutions.
Another reason why groups tend to do better is that a group has a better collective memory than one person does.
Lastly, a group working together can draw upon each other's strengths and talents, making the group more well-rounded and resource rich.
Answer:no
Explanation:
The reconstruction process didn't work but in my own opinion it was brought about the end of slavery but it didn't end the segregation and inequality....after the era of the reconstruction there were no longer slaves because of rules put in place but it didn't end segregation and inequality
It means something like 'produce the body'
basically it means that you can't keep the person in prison if they are summoned to court
if they are summoned to court, you have to get the person to court. you can't say "oh, the prisoner is in prison so they can't go to court"
one reason habeas corpus might exist is say you got imprisoned by somebody who doesn't like you
if the habeas corpus didn't exist and the court said "hey, let's put this person on trial" then the prison commander (or whatever) could refuse and keep you in prison. forever.
so that's what habeas corpus means
it means 'produce the body'
