Hebert's claim that contemporary (modern) maps are
"...as biased and conventional as ever".
<span>She justified this point of view that she claimed because she
thinks mapmakers have too much freedom and power, and that mapmakers display
what they want, how they want and no one questioned them. They are free to do
whatever they want. </span>
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>The appropriate response is gravity: an undetectable power that pulls objects toward one another.</em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
Thus, the closer items are to one another, the more grounded their gravitational draw is. Earth's gravity originates from all its mass. <em>All its mass makes a consolidated gravitational draw on all the mass in your body.</em>
The power/mass proportion is the equivalent for each. A straightforward guideline to hold up under as a primary concern is that all items <em>(paying little heed to their mass)</em> experience a similar increasing speed when in a condition of free fall.
<em>At the point when the main power is gravity, the speeding up is a similar incentive for all articles. On Earth, this speeding up worth is 9.8 m/s.</em>
The river that forms the border is known as the Paraná River
Answer:
“Grandpa’s surprise birthday party surprises everyone”
Explanation:
i think so
A rectangle is considered a special case of a parallelogram because a parallelogram is a quadrilateral with two pairs of opposite , equal and parell sides
