What is 0.000000685 written in scientific notation?

Which inequality would result in the shaded solution on the unit circle to the right?

omeli [17]

<h3>Answer: Choice B</h3>

Explanation:

Cosine is positive in quadrants I and IV, but quadrant IV isn't shaded in so we can rule out choice A.

Sine is positive in quadrants I and II. So far it looks like choice B could work. In fact, it's the answer because sin(pi/6) = 1/2 and sin(5pi/6) = 1/2. So if 0 ≤ sin(x) < 1/2, then we'd shade the region between theta = 0 and theta = pi/6; as well as the region from theta = 5pi/6 to theta = pi.

Choice C is ruled out because tangent is positive in quadrants I and III, but quadrant III isn't shaded.

Choice D is ruled out for similar reasoning as choice A. Recall that $\sec(x) = \frac{1}{\cos(x)}$

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The frequency table shows the results of tossing a number cube 50 times. Which statement

Paul [167]

Answer:

Option (1) is the correct option.

Step-by-step explanation:

From the given frequency table,

Option (1).

Tossing an even number is more likely than tossing an odd number.

Frequencies of tossing even numbers 2, 4, 6 = 10, 10, 9

Frequencies of tossing odd numbers 1, 3, 5 = 8, 6, 7

Which shows frequencies of tossing even numbers are more.

Therefore, Option (1) is correct.

Option (2)

The number 2 will be the next number tossed.

Since it is unpredictable, therefore, this option is incorrect.

Option (3)

Number 4 is half as likely to be tossed as the number 3.

Frequency of tossing number 3 = 6

Frequency of tossing 4 = 10

Frequency of tossing 3 is not the half of tossing 4.

Therefore, Option (3) is incorrect.

Option (4)

Probability of tossing the number 2 = $\frac{\text{Frequency of tossing 2}}{\text{Total frequency}}$

= $\frac{10}{8+10+6+10+7+9}$

= $\frac{10}{50}$

= $\frac{1}{5}$

Therefore, option (4) is incorrect.

3 0

3 years ago

*In ∆ABC, on the extension of the side BC , draw a line segment CD ≅ CA . Draw the segment AD . The line segment CE is the angle

Leya [2.2K]

CE ⊥ CF because m∠ECA + m∠FCA = 90°

Step-by-step explanation:

In ∆ABC

On the extension of the side BC , draw a line segment CD ≅ CA
Draw the segment AD
The line segment CE is the angle bisector of ∠ACB
The line segment CF is the median towards AD in ∆ ACD

We want to prove that CF ⊥ CE

Look to the attached figure

In Δ ABC

∵ CE is the bisector of angle ACB

∴ ∠ACE ≅ ∠BCE

In Δ ACD

∵ CA = CD

∴ Δ ACD is an isosceles triangle

∵ AD is the median towards AD

- In any isosceles triangle the median from a vertex to its opposite

side bisects this vertex

∴ AD bisects ∠ACD

∴ ∠ACF ≅ ∠DCF

∵ BCD is a straight segment

∵ CE , CA , CF are drawn from point C

∴ m∠BCE + m∠ACE + m∠ACF + m∠DCF = 180°

∵ m∠ACE ≅ m∠BCE

∵ m∠ACF ≅ m∠DCF

- Replace m∠BCE by m∠ACE and m∠DCF by m∠ACF

∴ m∠ACE + m∠ACE + m∠ACF + m∠ACF = 180°

∴ 2 m∠ACE + 2 m∠ACF = 180°

- Divide all terms by 2

∴ m∠ACE + m∠ACF = 90°

∴ EC ⊥ CF

CE ⊥ CF because m∠ECA + m∠FCA = 90°

Learn more:

You can learn more about perpendicular lines in brainly.com/question/11223427

#LearnwithBrainly

7 0

3 years ago

The world population at the beginning of 1980 was 4.5 billion. Assuming that the population continued to grow at the rate of app

AfilCa [17]

Answer:

$Q(t) = 4.5(1.013)^{t}$

The world population at the beginning of 2019 will be of 7.45 billion people.

Step-by-step explanation:

The world population can be modeled by the following equation.

$Q(t) = Q(0)(1+r)^{t}$

In which Q(t) is the population in t years after 1980, in billions, Q(0) is the initial population and r is the growth rate.

The world population at the beginning of 1980 was 4.5 billion. Assuming that the population continued to grow at the rate of approximately 1.3%/year.

This means that $Q(0) = 4.5, r = 0.013$

So

$Q(t) = Q(0)(1+r)^{t}$

$Q(t) = 4.5(1.013)^{t}$

What will the world population be at the beginning of 2019 ?

2019 - 1980 = 39. So this is Q(39).

$Q(t) = 4.5(1.013)^{t}$

$Q(39) = 4.5(1.013)^{39} = 7.45$

The world population at the beginning of 2019 will be of 7.45 billion people.

6 0

4 years ago

If it costs $0.15 per square inch for the cardboard label, then what is the cost for plan B?

IceJOKER [234]

Answer:

a box of plan B cost roughly $50.00

it is pretty expensive but you don't need an I.D.

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0

3 years ago