Answer:
I'm pretty sure it would be the 2nd one, since the third one was wrong, and this one makes the most sense. (out of the second and first & fourth)
Explanation:
Both claims have valid arguments, which make them strong.
Supporters of school gardens use statistical arguments that show how beneficial student participation in school gardens is. These statistical arguments show that research has been carried out where the data shows how good these activities are for students in their academic and personal lives, since it interferes even in their behavior. This can be seen in the lines "One of the strongest benefits [of School Gardens] is to social and emotional learning. Research shows that schools with a social and emotional learning program can increase test scores by 11% and positive classroom behavior by 9%. "
Opponents of school hostas also show strong arguments. They say that they are not against the existence of school gardens and that they do not want the end of them, but they are against the participation of students in this type of activity, because they believe that school gardens spend the time that students should be spending in academic activities and that would have more influence on their futures. This can be seen in the lines "Opponents say that no one wants gardens banned; they just don’t think school is the place for this type of learning."
Answer:
Victorian beliefs revolve around a person's Social Class, putting that before the crimes they may or may not commit.
Explanation:
As far as I know, it means 'combined'.
