The following sentence uses a straw man argument: "Those who are critical of self-driving cars need to learn to accept technological advances and stop resisting the future."
A straw man argument is when you give the impression that you are countering an opponent's point, when in reality you are "making up" a point that your opponent has not presented. It is like beating down a straw man or a dummy instead of a real adversary.
Here, people who are suspicious about self-driving cars are immediately described by the author as opposed to "technological advances" and "resisting the future." However, few people who have expressed doubts about self-driving cars would say that they are against scientific progress in general. Rather, they are concerned about the safety and the accuracy of the artifical intelligence, for example, but that does not mean that they are opposed to the idea. The author uses this rhetorical device to make his/her opponents lose credibility.
<span><span>I handled it properly. </span><span> Let's do this properly. I</span><span> like things done properly. </span><span>The pump didn't work properly. </span><span>I can't get the door to shut properly. </span></span>
If a fact, there is evidence within a secondary or primary source. That was the only option that include evidence, the other options just suggested it was a opinion.
Epidemiology is a type of science. I love all things science. It would be interesting to travel around the world and see the newest scientific discoveries. I would also love helping make sure that less and less people get sick. To make the world a healthier place.
Hope i can help anyone with my example. But, PLEASE don't plaigarize my work. THANKS BUNCHES, YA'LL!!!
