1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dafna1 [17]
3 years ago
13

Why did people regard FDR's court-packing scheme as a threat to the

History
1 answer:
OlgaM077 [116]3 years ago
7 0

Many people opposed FDR's court packing plan. Many people saw his move as a threat to the principle of separation of powers. People also accused the president of packing the court with people who supported his view. This completely made people not like this even more then they had before, although some people still did approve of FDR's packing plan. Eventually Roosevelt withdrew his plan after fighting for it for a long time, but he gave up.

You might be interested in
Which had the greatest influence on the way different Native American culture groups developed?
pashok25 [27]
C. the geography and climate of the area where they settled.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What effect did the American westward movement have on diplomatic relations with Great Britain and Spain?
PolarNik [594]
In general, this movement had a negative impact since lots of the expansion involved moving into territories that were controlled by European nations. Although most of the time physical conflict was avoided.
7 0
4 years ago
Match the following description to the correct person. "Wisconsin
WITCHER [35]

Answer:

O. Robert La Follette.

Explanation:

Robert Marion La Follette was the 20th Governor of Wisconsin, active in office from 1901 to 1906. He then became a member of the US Senate and became a huge critic for the administrative policies of the US, both domestic and foreign.

While in office as the Governor, Follette helped set up direct primaries in the United States, implementing primary elections. He also supported the policy of tax reforms on corporations, the growth of trade unions, and even helped create referendum ideas, initiatives, and recall.  

3 0
3 years ago
Please need help now.<br><br> How was the Vietnam war different from the Korean War?
Arte-miy333 [17]

Answer:

The Vietnam war was a colonial revolution rather than a civil war

Explanation:

  • The war in Vietnam was a war fought between 1955 and 1975 to prevent the reunification of Vietnam under a socialist or communist government. In this war the Republic of Vietnam (South Vietnam) participated, which was against the communists, with the support of the United States and other allied nations of the United States against the local guerrillas of the National Front for the Liberation of Vietnam ( Viet Cong) and the Army of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam (North Vietnam), backed by China and the Soviet Union. The conflict began with an attempt to unify the two Vietnam in a single coalition government between nationalists, communists and neutrals, according to the initial proposal. The actions of the United States to prevent this reunification, together with a succession of violent, corrupt and inefficient dictatorships imposed by the United States, provoked the armed uprising of several groups united under the self-styled National Liberation Front, Viet Cong, quickly supported by the then Soviet Union and Mao's China. Initially Saigon was losing ground.
  • The Korean War took place between 1950 and 1953. Its components were the Republic of Korea (or South Korea), supported by the armed forces of several countries commanded by the United States; and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (or North Korea), supported by the People's Republic of China and the Soviet Union. The war was one of the earliest episodes of the Cold War. Excluding more than 3 million civilians and almost 15% of the population of the dead North, it constitutes one of the most bloodthirsty wars in history. Five years before, after the end of World War II, the United States and the Soviet Union agreed to split Korea into two. They drew the border on the 38th parallel, leaving the North in charge of the Soviet Union and the South in charge of the United States. Each superpower controlled in its respective area the constitution of two new states that were under their respective orbits: the Democratic People's Republic of Korea in the north and the Republic of Korea in the south. Although negotiations were held for the reunification of Korea in the months before the war, the tension intensified with cross-border skirmishes and incursions on the 38th parallel. The escalation of tension degenerated into an open war when North Korea invaded South Korea on the 25th. June 1950.
8 0
3 years ago
What was the direct outcome of the 1948 Arab-lsraeli war?​
Zanzabum

The direct outcome of the 1948 Arab-Israeli war was in favor of Israel where not only did Israel could expand her territories but the Jews also fended off the invading Arabs although most of the residents of Palestine had to flee at first.

Explanation:

The Arabs wanted to take complete control and were against any sort of Jewish settlements, especially in Palestine.

After the Jewish buses were ambushed, the war erupted quickly and became a civil war where both the Arabs and Jews fought against each other.

After Israel was declared independent, more lands were added which led to its expansion and the signing of the armistice by the Arabs for peace to reign in the area once again.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Describe what happened in Kansas that led newspapers to write about ''Bleeding Kansas.''
    11·1 answer
  • Which detail from Heart of Darkness shows the ineffectiveness of the
    5·2 answers
  • All texts need certain structures to meet their purposes. Please select the best answer from the choices provided T F
    10·2 answers
  • WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST (NOT AS BIG AS IT SEEMS) PLEASE HELP
    15·1 answer
  • Which does not correctly describe the Louisiana Purchase
    7·2 answers
  • What best describes direct democarcy
    5·1 answer
  • What is the definition of Salt March?
    11·1 answer
  • 36. How did the founding fathers solve this problem of state<br> representation? *
    12·1 answer
  • What’s the answer???
    13·1 answer
  • Minority groups rallied behind what slogan?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!