1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mamont248 [21]
3 years ago
10

Why were many people in the Georgia Colony slow to support the American Revolution at first?

History
1 answer:
zimovet [89]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:A

Explanation: Due to the fact Georgia was one of the main colonies that prospered under British rule, they were hesitant to join the revolution as they believed they needed the British to protect them from the native Americans.

You might be interested in
Which of the following statements about sovereign states is NOT true?
pav-90 [236]
Out of the following statements, the one that is not true about sovereign states is that they decide their own foreign and domestic policies. 
6 0
2 years ago
Were human beings better off after the Neolithic Revolution?
worty [1.4K]

i personally think so but somtimes think no, The Neolithic Revolution, Neolithic Demographic Transition, Agricultural Revolution, or First Agricultural Revolution, was the wide-scale transition of many human cultures during the Neolithic period from a lifestyle of hunting and gathering to one of agriculture and settlement, making an increasingly larger population possible. These settled communities permitted humans to observe and experiment with plants to learn how they grew and developed. This new knowledge led to the domestication of plants.


Archaeological data indicates that the domestication of various types of plants and animals happened in separate locations worldwide, starting in the geological epoch of the Holocene[4] around 12,500 years ago.[5] It was the world's first historically verifiable revolution in agriculture. The Neolithic Revolution greatly narrowed the diversity of foods available, resulting in a downturn in human nutrition.


The Neolithic Revolution involved far more than the adoption of a limited set of food-producing techniques. During the next millennia it would transform the small and mobile groups of hunter-gatherers that had hitherto dominated human pre-history into sedentary (non-nomadic) societies based in built-up villages and towns. These societies radically modified their natural environment by means of specialized food-crop cultivation, with activities such as irrigation and deforestation which allowed the production of surplus food. Other developments found very widely are the domestication of animals, pottery, polished stone tools, and rectangular houses.


These developments, sometimes called the Neolithic package, provided the basis for densely populated settlements, specialization and division of labour, more trade, the development of non-portable art and architecture, centralized administrations and political structures, hierarchical ideologies, depersonalized systems of knowledge (e.g. writing), and property ownership. The earliest known civilization developed in Sumer in southern Mesopotamia (c. 5,500 BP); its emergence also heralded the beginning of the Bronze Age.


The relationship of the above-mentioned Neolithic characteristics to the onset of agriculture, their sequence of emergence, and empirical relation to each other at various Neolithic sites remains the subject of academic debate, and varies from place to place, rather than being the outcome of universal laws of social evolution. The Levant saw the earliest developments of the Neolithic Revolution from around 10,000 BCE, followed by sites in the wider Fertile Crescent.

4 0
3 years ago
What is a request for the president to be removed from office?
otez555 [7]

impeachment is the answer

7 0
2 years ago
Why were the germans receptive to hitlers ideology
hoa [83]
After WWI, the Allies made Germany sign the Treaty of Versailles, it was really harsh towards Germany, its destroyed it's economy, its army, and blamed the war on them.

Many Germans, suffering in these conditions, saw Hitler's party as a light, as hope for a better life for them an and their children, because Hitler wanted to restore Germany's glory, and with it, it's economy.

They felt betrayed by everyone, but Hitler was always on their side.
3 0
3 years ago
Who had a more privileged life in the Lodz ghetto: Esther Brunstein or Henryk Ross? Why?
lesantik [10]

The correct answer is Henryk Ross.

Henryk Ross had a much more privileged life in the ghetto than Esther Brunstein because he was a photographer for the German army. Therefore, he could live more comfortably, safe and get more food.

Moreover, as Henryk was a photographer, he was in charge of producing propaganda and identity photos for the Department of Statistics in Lodz Ghetto (in Poland). He could access to film and other processing facilities in the ghetto that he used to document the living conditions and the suffering of the Jews there, secretly.  

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following statements describes the system of government known as "democracy"?
    7·1 answer
  • Main idea of amendment 6
    11·1 answer
  • Capital at babylon, and created a wonder of engineering with the hanging garden
    15·1 answer
  • Why did Axum's marketplace develop a blended culture?
    15·1 answer
  • What decisions did Washington and the first congress have to make about the new government
    12·1 answer
  • What challenges dld Jews who went into hiding face?
    13·1 answer
  • How did antislavery activists justify disobeying the fugitive slave act
    13·1 answer
  • Fat is the most dangerous and lethal fat to have on your body
    12·1 answer
  • I want to know about the history of The Sino -Japanese War
    13·1 answer
  • What was the impact that the Arabs had on Africa during the Middle Ages?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!