I honestly am really surprised by your question. Obviously it was done intentionally based on the status of black and white lives at the time. But it does seem implied to some degree based on our status of races today. But I wouldn't exactly say it was an oversight. If I had to make an answer right off the top of my head I would say it would be in between Intentional and it being implied. But it would be closer to intentional in my opinion.
<h3>
Intentional answer Implied</h3>
|-------------------|----------------------------------------------|
(Thats my timeline)
"<span>Early labor unions wanted pay similar to that of skilled workers" is the best option from the list, but a better response would be that they wanted protection from employer abuse. </span>
Hammurabi was the sixth king of the Amorite First Dynasty of Babylon, assumed the throne from his father, Sin-Muballit, and expanded the kingdom to conquer all of ancient Mesopotamia<span>.
</span><span>The code of Hammurabi have helped Hammurabi maintain and consolidate his power </span>spent a considerable amount of time on campaign because he made sure to provide for the people whose lands he ruled over. A popular title applied to Hammurabi in his lifetime was bani matim, 'builder of the land', because of the many building projects and canals he ordered constructed throughout the region.
Answer:
It has been observed by an honorable gentleman [Smith], that a pure democracy, if it were practicable, would be the most perfect government.
Explanation:
