1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Colt1911 [192]
2 years ago
11

The map below shows the extent of the Byzantine Empire at three different times in history. Use the map to answer the following

question: Map of the Byzantine Empire showing the empire's extent in 565 CE, 1020 CE, and 1360 CE. By 565 CE, the empire included most of the North African coastline, parts of southern Spain, all of Italy, southeast Europe, Asia Minor, and the western Middle East. By 1020 CE, the size of the empire was limited to only southeast Europe, southern Italy, and Asia Minor. By 1360 CE, the size of the empire was reduced to only parts of southeast Europe, primarily to the west of Constantinople. At its point of greatest extent, in which regions did the Byzantine Empire hold territory? Italy, Russia, and the west coast of Africa Spain, Asia Minor, and North Africa The Dnieper, Danube, and Rhone rivers Northern Europe and southern Africa
History
1 answer:
alexgriva [62]2 years ago
8 0

The correct answer is - Spain, Asia Minor, and North Africa.

At its territorial peak, the Byzantine Empire became very big, and it was stretched on the Balkans, Asia Minor, the western coast of the Middle East, North Africa, Southern Italy, and even parts of Spain. This made it the biggest and most powerful empire in the region, at this point of time, and it had a very big cultural influence all over the territories where it was stretching.

You might be interested in
Rousseau believed in all of the following, EXCEPT
soldi70 [24.7K]
Rousseau believed in all of the following things except for the abolition of the church.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are the Lords demanding of the Crown? ( English Bill of Rights 1689)
butalik [34]

Answer:

It was to set out certain basic civil rights and clarifies who would be next to inherit the crown

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Identify three events that led to the Civil War. Explain How each was an important cause of the war.
Yuliya22 [10]

sorry if its 2 long remember only pick three

While the American Civil War (1861—1865) was devastating for the United States in terms of human loss of life, it was also the event that caused the American states to finally become united. A variety of events prompted the war, not just the underlying issues of slavery and states rights. From the end of the Mexican War to the election of Abraham Lincoln, the war’s roots were numerous and diverse.

With the end of the Mexican War in 1848 and the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, America was ceded western territories. This posed a problem. As these new territories would be admitted as states, would they be free or slave states? To deal with this, Congress passed the Compromise of 1850, which basically made California free and allowed the people in Utah and New Mexico to choose for themselves. This ability of a state to decide whether it would allow slavery was called popular sovereignty.

The Fugitive Slave Act was passed as part of the Compromise of 1850. This act forced any federal official who did not arrest a runaway slave to pay a fine. This was the most controversial part of the Compromise of 1850 and caused many abolitionists to increase their efforts against slavery. This act also prompted more activity along the Underground Railroad as fleeing slaves made their way to Canada.

"Uncle Tom's Cabin or Life Among the Lowly" was written in 1852 by Harriet Beecher Stowe. Stowe was an abolitionist who wrote this book to show the evils of slavery. This book, which was a best-seller at the time, had a huge impact on the way that Northerners viewed slavery. It helped further the cause of abolition, and even Abraham Lincoln recognized that this book's publication was one of the events that led to the outbreak of the Civil War.

In 1854, the Kansas-Nebraska Act was passed, allowing the Kansas and Nebraska territories to decide for themselves using popular sovereignty whether they wanted to be free or slave. By 1856, Kansas had become a hotbed of violence as pro- and anti-slavery forces fought over the state's future to the point where it was nicknamed "Bleeding Kansas." The widely reported violent events were a small taste of the violence to come with the Civil War.

One of the most publicized events in Bleeding Kansas was when, on May 21, 1856, Border Ruffians ransacked Lawrence, Kansas, which was known to be a staunch free-state area. One day later, violence occurred on the floor of the U.S. Senate. Pro-slavery Congressman Preston Brooks attacked Senator Charles Sumner with a cane after Sumner had given a speech condemning the pro-slavery forces for the violence occurring in Kansas.

In 1857, Dred Scott lost his case that argued that he should be free because he had been held as a slave while living in a free state. The Supreme Court ruled that his petition could not be seen because he did not hold any property. But it went further, stating that even though he had been taken by his "owner" into a free state, he was still a slave because slaves were to be considered the property of their owners. This decision furthered the cause of abolitionists as they increased their efforts to fight against slavery.

When the Kansas-Nebraska Act passed, Kansas was allowed to determine whether it would enter the Union as free or slave. Numerous constitutions were advanced by the territory to make this decision. In 1857, the Lecompton Constitution was created, allowing for Kansas to be a slave state. Pro-slavery forces supported by President James Buchanan attempted to push the Constitution through the U.S. Congress for acceptance. However, there was enough opposition that in 1858 it was sent back to Kansas for a vote. Even though it delayed statehood, Kansas voters rejected the Constitution and became a free state.

John Brown was a radical abolitionist who had been involved in anti-slavery violence in Kansas. On October 16, 1859, he led a group of 17, including five black members, to raid the arsenal located in Harper's Ferry, Virginia (now West Virginia). His goal was to start a slave uprising using the captured weapons. However, after capturing several buildings, Brown and his men were surrounded and eventually killed or captured by troops led by Colonel Robert E. Lee. Brown was tried and hanged for treason. This event added more fuel to the growing abolitionist movement that helped lead to open warfare in 1861.

With the election of Republican candidate Abraham Lincoln on November 6, 1860, South Carolina followed by six other states seceded from the Union. Even though his views about slavery were considered moderate during the nomination and presidential campaign, South Carolina had warned it would secede if he won. Lincoln agreed with the majority of the Republican Party that the South was becoming too powerful and made it part of the party platform that slavery would not be extended to any new territories or states added to the Union.

4 0
3 years ago
What is one possible reason a constitutional monarchy developed in England while an absolute monarchy continued in Russia
Alexxx [7]

Constitutional monarchy developed in England because the Magna Carta placed limits on the Kings in 1215. Gradually the idea of ​​a Parliament began to take shape, which, little by little, removed powers from the monarchs. In 1649, King Charles I rebelled, found that he had unlimited powers, raised taxes as much as he could, and as a result was judged as a traitor and executed. After a period of exception, the monarchy was reinstituted with its son, Charles II, in the power. The message was clear: the monarchy could not and could not aspire to be absolute, thus passing to constitutional monarchy.

This kind of monarchy did not develop in Russia because the monarchy was overthrown during the Russian revolution and was never restored. In its place the Bolshevik Party took over.

Newly industrialized and suffering from World War I, Russia had a large mass of workers and peasants working hard and earning little. In addition, Tsar Nicholas II's absolutist government disliked the people who wanted a less oppressive and more democratic leadership. The sum of the factors led to popular demonstrations that caused the monarch to resign and, at the end of the process, gave rise to the Soviet Union, the first socialist country in the world, which lasted until 1991.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1.Discuss labor union regulations in your state.
snow_lady [41]

Answer:

For the first ask: I live on Argentina. The Argentine union is responsible for assuming union representation for a company or activity. each company is manage by a single union.

For the second: Currently in my country there is a lot of unemployment. especially for the youth society. The only possibility is to work for employees and collect a very low salary. It is a real problem because it affects the economy and education of the country. It affects education because many stop studying for work and provide for their families.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did the Cold War affect Europe
    13·1 answer
  • What made the bursum bill publicity war successful
    6·2 answers
  • Which event was most closely tied to the rise of fascist dictators in the 1930’s
    10·2 answers
  • Justice Bradley of the U.S. Supreme Court wrote this comment. It appears in the case summary for Bradwell v. Illinois, 1872.
    6·2 answers
  • Why did Germany postpone it's invasion of Britain
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following was a result of the armistice signed ending the Korean War?​
    6·1 answer
  • Which aspect of work in the reconstruction south was a crucial priority for freedmen?
    15·1 answer
  • What happens if you don't vote?
    8·2 answers
  • Which practice best describes the purpose of the National Archive and Records Administration
    13·2 answers
  • What did the South African government hope to accomplish by passing<br> apartheid legislation?
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!