Music, friends, family, everything that makes you happy. just surround yourself
Answer:
B) athletes
Explanation:
Considering the lifestyles of athletes, we can assume that associating with them should reduce the risk of victimization. Athletes tend to work out during the day or the afternoons and tend to rest at night. They also smoke less and consume less alcohol and other types of drugs.
The lifestyle theory of victimology states that the chances of an individual suffering from a crime depend heavily on their own lifestyle. For example, most crimes happen at night, so people who like to hang out at night are more likely to suffer some type of victimization.
This theory also states that the percentage of criminals is very small (compared to society as a whole) and their crimes are unevenly distributed. This creates places with high risk of criminal occurrence. The lifestyle of individuals can determine the likelihood of being a victim or being a criminal specially through exposure to certain situations.
Answer:
<u>Because of the nature of the items</u>
Explanation:
It seems <em>illogical </em>to conclude that the government would able to accurately track down deadly meat out of a pool of several tons of processed meat.
However, to determine defective toys or other non-meat products from stores would require little technical issues, whereas to examine meatpacking companies may require gathering expert dieticians to determine what meat should be categorized as "deadly meat", etc.
Different levels are required from different parts of the government for the safety of other and for the preparation for the worst possible outcome while a soldier is in duty. They came less effient due to lack of time and underemployed departments. They’ve became more expensive so they can have better technology and get the best training possible. Governments can affect small areas on a positive or negative ways, one positive way is funding their schools and other systems. A negative way is raiding the place or taking it under their control.
In this scenario, Keith appears to be having normal thought processes.
His behavior would not be considered delusional because his concern about his boss not inviting him to lunch was explained, and it made sense to him. If he was experiencing delusional disorder, he would not be able to shake off the feeling, even with a logical explanation.
