Answer:
The share of bill net income is $24,857
Explanation:
The computation of the share of bill net income is shown below:
Given that
Profit sharing ratio of Bill and BOb is 6 : 1
And, the net income of the firm is $29,000
So, the share of bill net income is
= Net income × bill share
= $29,000 × 6 ÷ 7
= $24,857
Hence, the share of bill net income is $24,857
We simply applied the above formula so that the correct value could come
And, the same is to be considered
Answer:
Present value of this stream of payments=97,179.75
Explanation:
The payment stream described is an ordinary annuity, 10 equal payments in equal intervals, with the 1st payment being received at the end of year 10 and the last one at the end of the 20th year.
Present value of an ordinary annuity is calculated as follows:
![Present value =PMT*\frac{[1-(1+i)^-^n]}{i}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20Present%20value%20%3DPMT%2A%5Cfrac%7B%5B1-%281%2Bi%29%5E-%5En%5D%7D%7Bi%7D)
Where PMT is equal payments made each period
= $20,500
i is the required rate of return per period
= 5%
n is the number of periods= 10
Applying this formula would thus give the present value of the annuity at the end of year 10 as follows:
= 158,295.57
This is the present value at the end of year 10, and this value has to be discounted 10 years back to today as follows:
=97,179.75
Answer:
Answer is option b i.e. large lot sizes to save on setup costs and to gain quantity discounts.
Explanation:
The just-in-time partnership is a Japanese management strategy that increases efficiency by minimizing the inventory to manufacture products with zero defects. Toyota was the first to use this strategy to increase the quality of the manufactured product by reducing wastes and increasing productivity. This strategy does not include large lot sizes to save on setup costs but rather focuses on buying only the required amount of inventory which is required for the production. Hence, the answer is option b.
Answer: Because many executives have access to company jets, boards of directors have a responsibility to ensure that shareholders are not footing the bill for personal travel.
Explanation: because it would be English error to make use of a 'comma' before a clause that begins with 'that'
(2nd and 3rd sentence)
Answer:
Explanation:
You have to consider interest rates and tax situations. Payments made in lump sum would attract higher interest rates than payments made in part, this will have an effect on the net present value.
If cash proceeds from payments are meant for Investments, then a lump sum payment is preferable.