<span>In Pico Della Mirandola's "</span><span>Oration on the Dignity of Man", he </span>accepted the premise that human beings are the most wonderful of all creations, but he inquired into the reasons why this should be so. Some, he said, believed that human beings are wonderful because they can reason and are close to God, yet the same qualities, he pointed out, may be found among the angels.
Answer:
It fails to support its claim with specific, credible evidence and uses a disrespectful tone.
Explanation:
When giving arguments in favor or against a specific subject, they must be supported by reason and logic as well as credible evidence that can be compared with reality. They also need to be coherent with the things you are stating, this has to be done in a respectful tone as you are open to the idea of others comments and counterarguments. You are supposed to show you are right with these arguments, not by insulting or despising others.
In my opinion, this excerpt fails in both. It is not respectful and it's arguments are not strong enough.
He states that there is not proof of who is right or wrong on the debate adressed, he needs to support this with evidence. Who states that?
He the concludes that "no valid judgment can be made for everyone on whether smartphones should be banned from teens." This seems as an opinion based on his own reasoning.
After this, he starts making judgments about the people supporting the restriction, calling them naïve. This is not polite or useful. As I said, this is not based on evidence, he is contradicting himself as he stated in the first lines that there was no evidence of who was rigth or wrong.
The next lines express just his opinions based on his values and thoughts, evidence to support them is never presented.
Answer:
The answer is no2, no3 and no4
Explanation:
Sorry if it's wrong but I search it on internet
The central idea of the book, <em>Saleem which trials</em> is that is shows the unfairness of the community that convicts people that are innocent and people that are guilty or compromised, escape punishment.
This is aptly shown in the given text as the falsely accused of being witches are unfairly tried and put to death, while the compromised ones walk free.
<h3>What is a Central Idea?</h3>
This refers to the main message that an author wants to pass across in a given text.
Hence, we can see that The central idea of the book, <em>Saleem which trials</em> is that is shows the unfairness of the community that convicts people that are innocent and people that are guilty or compromised, escape punishment.
This is aptly shown in the given text as the falsely accused of being witches are unfairly tried and put to death, while the compromised ones walk free.
Read more about Salem Witch Trials here:
brainly.com/question/24750226
#SPJ1
