I believe the answer to this is "true." Really, all conclusions on all events are subjective. But considering history, conclusions on events are especially prone to subjectivity. Consider who writes the history books. If one country wins a war against another country, they will write about themselves as the noble party and portray the enemy as villainous. However, this may not be the real case. This occurs much more than we think, and we must research different events to make sure we are not blindly buying into what people say. Hope this helps.
C. qit .uk ncludes the writers
Answer:
D). The nonfictional excerpt describes the reaction to the regulations.
Explanation:
As per the question, the key distinction between the presentation of regulations in the fictional and non-fictional excerpt is that the latter(non-fictional excerpt) offers a response to the ordinances presented in the former(fictional excerpt). The fictional excerpt simply reveals the directions that people are required to follow during the quarantine(should avoid...should be marked, etc.) while the non-fictional description aims to depict the reaction of setting these regulations('cutting off...shut us out'). Thus, <u>option D</u> is the correct answer.
Answer:
what you have already is good
Explanation:
Answer:
Both poets draw general truths from their subjects.
Explanation:
