The answer is <em>Sales Tax</em> can be described as Indirect and Regressive. It is indirect because the retribution that the consumer is going pay is collected by the seller, who acts as an intermediary between the people and the government and then is handed to the government (contrary to the direct type in which the taxation amount goes directly into the government's arks).
This type of system is also regressive because it doesn't change (increasing or decreasing) according to the payer's income. Instead, it puts a heavier contribution load on the people with lower incomes, and not on the rich and more wealthy part of the population.
Globalization in essence is companies and governments climbing onto the world stage and interacting internationally.
Globalization has helped some, but it has also hurt a lot, specifically through:
- Making the rich richer
- Removing trade barriers only for new ones to rise (VAT taxes, etc.)
- Increased trade deficits with many jobs leaving their developed nations for less developed ones (U.S. manufacturing to China, etc.)
- Developed country job pay cuts
- MNC's leaving countries and exploiting international tax havens
- MNC's overseeing bad work conditions in countries with less regulations
- MNC's influencing international politics
- Exploitation of labor
- Social welfare schemes
Et cetera, et cetera...
All the problems we hear about with companies leaving their countries and stranding thousands if not millions of people without jobs, and labor issues in other countries all stem from globalization. So we need to decide if the benefits outweigh the costs here or not...
Answer:
D is the answer to this question
Answer:
Among individuals age 65 and over, the number of three-generation households has declined from 70 percent in 1980 to 16 percent in 2010.
Explanation:
